Historically, what is it about them that seems to cause us problems? The obvious response is that it's because they're better than us - but surely not all of them? We've already lost to two and another one's up for us tomorrow, with Arsenal, Chelsea and Palace to come.
Table wise, the three heavywieghts currently occupy three of the top 4 Champions league spots, with the other three struggling in the bottom 6 along with us. If I was Malky, I'd be looking for two of those to be below us come May.
Tomorrow's game more important in many ways than the home tie we lost against Spurs last week. So do we go for the point or go for the throat?
More of the same is the probably the preferred way, but that starting eleven Malky puts out will define it. Starting chances for both Odem and Noone would be too much to expect unless Malky was as pissed of with Fraizer as he sounded for not taking that chance going around Lloris last week.
Fraizer and Bellers on the bench with Odem up top and Noone out wide? Mutch in for Gunnar?
This is going to be very interesting.
Table wise, the three heavywieghts currently occupy three of the top 4 Champions league spots, with the other three struggling in the bottom 6 along with us. If I was Malky, I'd be looking for two of those to be below us come May.
Tomorrow's game more important in many ways than the home tie we lost against Spurs last week. So do we go for the point or go for the throat?
More of the same is the probably the preferred way, but that starting eleven Malky puts out will define it. Starting chances for both Odem and Noone would be too much to expect unless Malky was as pissed of with Fraizer as he sounded for not taking that chance going around Lloris last week.
Fraizer and Bellers on the bench with Odem up top and Noone out wide? Mutch in for Gunnar?
This is going to be very interesting.
will be plenty of fellow Bluebirds to enjoy a drink and a laugh with 
joking but be good to see you/us all there in fine voice. up the blooooooobirds!

