Yet someone on here said populations are irrelevant when it comes to attendances. Norwich is a lot smaller than Hull yet there was 26,000 for their first game. Leeds was a sell out. The top tier of Lowfield Road wasn't open for some reason They could no doubt get higher crowds. Though there crowds have never been that great given the size of the city even in the Revie days.
Hmmm...i think it's time the Narch superfans bubble was burst. Even their owner doesn't rate them ffs
Double oyr crowd from a much smaller city. Of course the,atmosphere doesn't compare with the seething, intimidating cauldron that is the KCOM. Though they took enough, a lot further distance than it is for us, to fill the upper tier at Bramall Lane and a good part of tbe lower tier. We won't.
The tired old nowt to do in Norwich riposte. Any pictures of them gathering the harvest in within Norwich? Does it interfere with the traffic and inconvenience the office workers and shoppers?
When comparing attendances to Leeds, their boundaries and ours are apparently the same, but when it comes to our poor performance on tables for teenage pregnancy, obesity and school results, it’s because unlike Leeds, most of Hull’s suburbs aren’t actually in Hull and therefore aren’t included. Can’t have it both ways.
