I didn't say it did, in fact I specifically said I didn't absolve the troublemakers.
Back then EVERY club's fans had its troublemakers. People who only went to away games to fight. That is what football hooliganism was like - but there weren't killings at games.
If Hillsborough had been in as poor a state as Heysel Stadium then there wouldn't have been as many deaths there, simply because the walls of the Leppings Lane Pens would have given way.
Have you watched the documentary I posted? There was no trouble on the streets before the game nor in any other part of the stadium before the tragedy. Just in that one part where Liverpool and Juve fans were on opposite sides of a chainlink fence.
What do we say when away fans pelt home fans at the Stadium of Light? ****house away fans, but the club shouldn't have the away fans in such a position where they can cause trouble.
Crowd control is the responsibility of the stadium owner, the match organisers. It suited UEFA, Brussels and Belgian authorities to have British fans carry the entire blame for the Heysel disaster.
Britain sent a senior crowd safety officer from London Fire Brigade over to inspect and report on the disaster's causes. Despite talking to lots of sports reporters to find out what they would do to solve the hooliganism problem, Maggie Thatcher never even spoke to that officer on the phone, let alone have a meeting with him. So I guess it suited her too to be able to blame English fans from a labour metropolis.
The responsibility is the responsibiilty of the fans. Back in the day there was no need for separation of the fans.