Match Day Thread LFC v Union SG

[saintanton]

See your point but it was a new paragraph so unassociated to the previous statement / comment

Like I said, I don't want to continue this.
Solid misunderstood and I could see why, that's all.

 

[Zanjinho]

Like I said, I don't want to continue this.
Solid misunderstood and I could see why, that's all.

I'm taking that as a victory...

[HASHTAG]#apologyaccepted[/HASHTAG]

...

 

[saintanton]

I'm taking that as a victory...

[HASHTAG]#apologyaccepted[/HASHTAG]

...

Have it.

 

[Garlic Klopp]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[Garlic Klopp]

Decent line up considering the opposition, with strength on the bench if midfield does not work out very well

 

[Zanjinho]

Very surprised Jones isn't playing

 

[organic red]

Wonder who is playing the 6......Grav or Endo?

 

[InBiscanWeTrust]

Blimey, all I did was point out to Solid that he'd misunderstood and explained why I thought that misunderstanding might have occurred.
I don't want to get into a protracted discussion over this, I'm just answering the question put to me then hopefully let it go.
Although I try to write as well as I can I'm no expert. With my limited grammatical knowledge I would say that the sentence can be split into two, and the appeal is the subject of the first clause - Jones is the subject of the second clause but there is no personal pronoun to make that clear.
"Jones red card appeal rejected/ so [he] will serve 3 match ban"
I agree that the second sentence would require a "with" to make it about the ban:
" assume [it] will start [with] this one then"
The principle I go on is that if you leave words out you're expecting the reader to fill them in, and if they're not on the same wavelength as you then misunderstandings can occur.
And one did.
Like I said earlier, there's no clear right and wrong here, just a bit of ambiguity.

Even I’m confused what I meant now

 

[InBiscanWeTrust]

Anyway… turns out Jones isn’t even starting

 

[InBiscanWeTrust]

Kelleher must be injured as not even on bench.

Shoukd be a win. Wonder if Mac is desperate to get on pitch to play against his brother

 

[moreinjuredthanowen]

Good line up.

I heard kellehr had his knee split open in trianing and has 12 stitches.

no doak is a little shock


Jones meh. all 3 cms deserve their pitch time. let them all stake a claim on lcm for next sunday.

 

[Zanjinho]

Wonder who is playing the 6......Grav or Endo?

Legendo. Gravenberch is more of a B2B player anyway

 

[Bumps]

Speaking of miscommunication - remember you questioned the use of the word "off" in the transcript?
That word has now mysteriously disappeared from here:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/liverpool-var-audio-offside-diaz-31097359
and here:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...transcript-luis-diaz-goal-liverpool-tottenham
Though it can still be heard in the audio.
Odd.

Got to be a rational explanation
No conspiracy here
Seems to be very little going to happen lol

 

[quinneristops]

How did Nunez miss that

 

[LuisDiazgamechanger]

Nunez you have started again...we should be one up.

 

[Bumps]

Feeds the wums those sorts of misses

 

[Sucky]

That Nunez miss was actually shocking.

 

[Sucky]

Feeds the wums those sorts of misses

Ridiculously bad

 

[LuisDiazgamechanger]

Possessions count for nothing without goals.

 

[moreinjuredthanowen]

very bright start from both sides.

Elliott run was good but the pass to salah was even better.

nunez is shameful. absolutely shameful. thst goes all day every day and he misses the target again by miles. you have to hit the target to be a top striker sorry. too many times now.