Let's laugh at Arsenal (again)!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
<laugh> you claim my argument is moronic when I said part of your first team which they were (you do realise that each season every team has to declare who has to be part of the first team squad?!?) I never said they were part of your starting 11 you just made a stupid assumption that has come back to bite you making your comments look very stupid indeed. Even your own spurs website proved my argument was correct perhaps you should scuttle away back to Wikipedia as your losing miserably here <whistle>

I don't claim your argument is moronic - I demonstrate why your argument is moronic. The fact you keep saying Nelsen is a Spurs player, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary (especially from QPR's website) underline what a moronic argument you're making, for the simple reason you're clearly a moron.

And the fact remains that Nelsen and Saha were not first teamers - if anything, they were glorified loanees. The fact they were released (which is how Nelsen signed for QPR on a one-year contract - I suggest you Google it) indicates they were not first team players. After all, if they were, why were they released?

oh dear so explain the reason for the other players I have mentioned then? go on this should be easy for you

Corluka was a someone who lost his place, Nelsen and Saha players drafted in on a short-term basis to fill out the squad, and Kranjcar was a utility player. Pretty easy for somebody blessed with the gift of intellect.

How about you tell us about Fabregas, Van Persie, Nasri and Clichy? Come on, dum-dum, why not justify your hilarious visits to our board and tell us that those four key members of your first team are in any way comparable to Nelsen, Saha, Kranjcar and Corluka.
 
i think what the brain thinks and how the fingers interprete it on the keyboard are 2 diffrent things for our friend Altbouli.
 
You're the idiot, don't talk like a tart. Its not the fact we weren't in the CL, its the fact you were, WITH its revenue each year. You've paid multiple players 100k+ a week for years, you've posted after tax profits in excess of ours year on year. Have a look where you are in the Forbes richest club list.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17769654

Arsenal have had greater resources.

Do you want to **** off now you daft ****s. <doh>

<doh> This is just a pathetic argument that makes no sense whatsoever your blaming us for being in the champions league and cite the fact that you couldn&#8217;t get into the champions league as a case that we have more resources than you <doh> A child could come up with better arguments than this, the fact that you resort to personal insults against me shows your intelligence, I will leave you to your poor argument as I fear that you wont come up with anything better.
 
I don't claim your argument is moronic - I demonstrate why your argument is moronic. The fact you keep saying Nelsen is a Spurs player, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary (especially from QPR's website) underline what a moronic argument you're making, for the simple reason you're clearly a moron.

And the fact remains that Nelsen and Saha were not first teamers - if anything, they were glorified loanees. The fact they were released (which is how Nelsen signed for QPR on a one-year contract - I suggest you Google it) indicates they were not first team players. After all, if they were, why were they released?



Corluka was a someone who lost his place, Nelsen and Saha players drafted in on a short-term basis to fill out the squad, and Kranjcar was a utility player. Pretty easy for somebody blessed with the gift of intellect.

How about you tell us about Fabregas, Van Persie, Nasri and Clichy? Come on, dum-dum, why not justify your hilarious visits to our board and tell us that those four key members of your first team are in any way comparable to Nelsen, Saha, Kranjcar and Corluka.

A quote from one of my earilier posts: Let me explain it to you slowley so that you understand, those players I mentioned where part of your first team, they arent anymore but your website still shows Saha and Nelson as part of your first team irrespective of if their not anymore they were part of your first team. I never once said Nelson is still a Spurs player and I challenge you to point were I have said that. I said he along with the rest of the players I mentioned were part of you first team, You then tried to use Wikipedia to prove that they weren&#8217;t part of the spurs first team and failed miserably twice, now you are making claims about me which I have proven again as false, 3 times you have been made to look the fool but you obviously dont seem to understand that you are wrong although I have given you facts to prove so.
 
i think what the brain thinks and how the fingers interprete it on the keyboard are 2 diffrent things for our friend Altbouli.

Another personal snipe towards me, and I thought we were having a sensible discussion. it seems every time I prove a point posters on here resort to petty insults or underhanded snipes towards me. No doubt I will be called a wum or worse for proving my point so I will leave before I get bombarded by insults.
 
Another personal snipe towards me, and I thought we were having a sensible discussion. it seems every time I prove a point posters on here resort to petty insults or underhanded snipes towards me. No doubt I will be called a wum or worse for proving my point so I will leave before I get bombarded by insults.

all i meant was..your getting your facts jumbled up....<steam>
 
Altbouli, if you add the word squad after first team, you have a debating point. You are still wrong, but leaving the word squad out makes you sound ludicrous.
 
<doh> This is just a pathetic argument that makes no sense whatsoever your blaming us for being in the champions league and cite the fact that you couldn&#8217;t get into the champions league as a case that we have more resources than you <doh> A child could come up with better arguments than this, the fact that you resort to personal insults against me shows your intelligence, I will leave you to your poor argument as I fear that you wont come up with anything better.

Blame??? what are you on about???, and you now prove what a ****pot I initially thought you were. In the very first instance I said Arsenal have had more financial resources than Spurs, yet Spurs (with less financial resources) have crept up on you, that is all.

That is a statement of fact. Sadly then, all the members of The Thick Club including yourself try and say no thats not the case. We've crept up and passed Liverpool, and to a point Chelsea this season, I suppose they haven't had greater resources either.

Oh, and by the way, this a forum full of football fans and players....we swear! Is that what you do at a match or in the pub, whinge when you hear a naughty word! Just **** off elsewhere you big cry baby. <doh>
 
Blame??? what are you on about???, and you now prove what a ****pot I initially thought you were. In the very first instance I said Arsenal have had more financial resources than Spurs, yet Spurs (with less financial resources) have crept up on you, that is all.

That is a statement of fact. Sadly then, all the members of The Thick Club including yourself try and say no thats not the case. We've crept up and passed Liverpool, and to a point Chelsea this season, I suppose they haven't had greater resources either.hen people

Oh, and by the way, this a forum full of football fans and players....we swear! Is that what you do at a match or in the pub, whinge when you hear a naughty word! Just **** off elsewhere you big cry baby. <doh>

I did wonder when people's patience with the Gooner would run out. We may have reached tipping point!
 
Have to say I see no issue with betting on your own team. Against it, then of course it is wrong. Especially as he wasn't even involved. Still a twat though.
 
Have to say I see no issue with betting on your own team. Against it, then of course it is wrong. Especially as he wasn't even involved. Still a twat though.

It's because he's very well placed to have insider information so isn't allowed to place bets on Arsenal games, let alone advise others to do the same. Remember when that rich Chinese guy inferred that Fergie told him who to bet on in that undercover documentary? Fergie had to come out and deny it all before it was swiftly swept back under the carpet despite a lot of questions remaining unanswered.
 
You're the idiot, don't talk like a tart. Its not the fact we weren't in the CL, its the fact you were, WITH its revenue each year. You've paid multiple players 100k+ a week for years, you've posted after tax profits in excess of ours year on year. Have a look where you are in the Forbes richest club list.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17769654

Arsenal have had greater resources.

Do you want to **** off now you daft ****s. <doh>


Actually I think you will find that probably on cesc was on 100k a week, no other player in our history has received 100k a week.
 

Gervinho £70,000 <laugh>
Manuel Almunia £60,000 <laugh>
Sebastien Squillaci £60,000 <laugh>
Aaron Ramsey £55,000 <laugh>

We're hardly ones to talk with Bentley and that but ****ing hell, that's ridiculous! I know I said on their board that Chamakh was understandable as every club does it but at what point was Ramsey good enough to get such a big wage? Squillaci was thrown out of Seville into £60k a week? Gervinho strolled in at the same wage as a proven player like Vermaelen and more than Sagna???
 
wasn't Bale on about £40k before his new deal? If so, the following were all paid the same as him:
Lukasz Fabianski
Wojciech Szczesny
Armand Traore
Ju Young Park
Kieran Gibbs