Transfer Rumours Let's ignore the big ****ing elephant and blame the latest manager, again. Are we nearly there yet?

It won't be both. Kim Min is first choice but if we don't get him then it's Disasi. Both look good imo and the release clauses are low.

The only thing delaying us getting deals done now is this takeover bullshit.

 

I think whichever way it goes the funds for transfers will be there, so ETH can just crack on regardless.

 

The sale process is getting more dramatic by the day.

 

The Glazers are simply doing what they do best - milking the most money out of the club with little regard for the manager or, indeed, the good name of the club. They are simply playing one bidder off against the other, all the while stalling. Any announcement of the sale will have to be made to the New York stock exchange before release to the media, so noon UK time.

 

That’s to the contrary. News needs to be first made public so that everyone can equally benefit from it with regards to stock price on the exchange. Once the news is public, the stock price will reflect the price when the market opens or during market intraday. They don’t have to release the news during trading hours either. It can be done at any time. Many M&As take place over the weekend as an example.

Ultimately, these bastardized pigs are seeking a win-win-mega win for themselves and themselves alone.

 

Any material fact that might affect the share price of a listed company must be advised to the relevant regulatory authority before news is released to the media, this is so that the regulatory authority can determine whether such information will have an adverse or positive affect on the share price. This is to protect shareholders in cases where the share price might fall significantly, in such cases the regulatory authority can suspend trading to manage the outcome. The sale of the club to either bidder is likely to increase the share price, my holdings have increased 12% since last year, an outcome that would increase the overall cost of the Ineos bid as they would have to buy out the Glazers holdings within a specifies period at the then current share value.

 

I'm not sure the sale isn't affecting the transfer purchases.

For them to be authorising funds after two potential buyers have already committed to billions, is like having two ridiculously high offers on your house and deciding to fork out for an extension. Why the fck would you.

Just agree the sale or call it off, but release the funds for player purchases.

It's no coincidence the date Raimi have set for the announcement (14th June) is the same day the transfer window opens. Hmmmm... now I wonder why that is!

 

I am absolutely pissed off thst the Glazers have gone crying to PSG owners in an attempt to get them to influence the Arabs to better Radcliffes offer.

 

Yeah but the notification of the exchange is not time bound in the form of 12pm GMT on Monday. A public company can indeed release material information at any time, including weekends, provide disclosures to SEC if on NYSE, and notify the exchange in the process. And when the market opens, or even during intraday, the exchange will manage the mechanics of settling open contracts in an event of bankruptcy or M&A.

Nothing is materially stopping the Glazers from releasing news over the weekend if they have accepted an offer.

 

Some random account on Twitter posted that the deal is done which spiked the stock price in after hours trading.

No official news from the club, however. Meaning the Glazers are still in.

 

Probably Glazerfodder trying to make a quick buck.

 

Hahaha

 

Which deal have the twatteratzi gone for?

 

With PSG reportedly prepared to sell Mbappe this summer, the likely destination has to be Real. If he goes to Real, then that clown Levy has to sell Kane who would likely run down his contract if not sold off. Barca is broke but I guess you can’t count them out.

 

Oil money, brav!

 

Nice if true, get the debt off the books and no more £30m per year bonuses for the Glazers.
We would be well more than self sufficient.

 

If we can just get rid of that ridiculous debt, that should be the winning bid, even as much as I loathe the idea of a Middle East owner.

 

I would like to know why a middle east owner would be any worse than Ineos for Manchester United?

The problem I have is with the ethics of filthy rich owners trying to fake sponsorships and use fake accounting to break FFP rules. But considering the income we earn and the sponsorships we're able to get regardless, I think our financial self-sufficiency (+ debt paid off) would mean we wouldn't need to do any of that bollox and we'd still stay within FFP.

 

I agree with your statement.

I personally don’t care for the moral arguments. The only key thing that matters is sustainable operations that will not be affected if owners run out of money or even avoid being bankrolled solely by rich owners. You alluded it as self-sufficiency. Unfortunately, the Glazers have ran the club to the ground through their leveraged purchase and their dividends. I find it astonishing that the premier league permits for this type of daylight robbery when it comes to owning a club.

 

Oh, they're absolutely fine with it. The premier league has been making its own money off the back of Manchester United since the whole thing began.

As long as we don't break the non existent ffp rules, we can be freely plunged into a billion pound debt by any **** walking in off the street.

They don't give a **** on any of it and are literally powerlss to do anything about both sides of that coin.