Leeds Utd v Bimingham Match thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

SCORELINE: Leeds Utd v Birmingham City

  • 0-0

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 1-1

    Votes: 2 12.5%

  • 2-2

    Votes: 4 25.0%

  • 3-3 or higher

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Leeds by 1

    Votes: 7 43.8%

  • Brum by 1

    Votes: 1 6.3%

  • Leeds by 2

    Votes: 5 31.3%

  • Brum by 2

    Votes: 1 6.3%

  • Leeds by 3 or more

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Brum by 3 or more

    Votes: 1 6.3%
  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
ellandback said:
You must log in or register to see images


Not being funny but if you saw this person at your local supermarket, you'd make a run for it.... Surely!
Click to expand...
Isn't that the thing they used to do on Question of Sport with three "personalities" to make one face? I'll start with Dennis Law (top), ladyboy Beckham in the middle and Gordon McQueen for the bottom
 
  • Like
Reactions: lifecheshirewhite, Farsleyexile and ellandback
Whitejock said:
No, quite wrong. You pissed me off. In yet another targeted attack. And the disappointing thing is that you just don't see it. Or do you?

I was excited about the new season & wanted to discuss with everyone. That's why I came back. But you couldn't let the past go. An extract of the exchange:

You: Can't educate pork. I can't be responsible for explaining everything that escapes you... Life is too short.
Me: Ah, still the usual tactic. When required to provide evidence for, defend or elaborate on your opinion, you still fire a load of accusatory bluster & retreat, claiming it's everyone's fault but yours. Nothing's changed then. Why spend time explaining yourself when it's far easier to find someone else to attack?
You: Depends on the subject been (sic) discussed. But of course no opinion will be worth as much as yours! Stop hectoring, your petticoat is showing again and I don't want you flouncing off again.
You: Alternatively it's just more fun to prick your pomposity. No point eating time trying to explain to a closed mind.
Me: Pot. Kettle. Black. "They don't like it up 'em, Captain Mainwairing", to quote an apt phrase.
Me: Pompous, closed mind. Only 2 unwarranted insults so far. I guess the day is yet young.
You: Statements of my opinion not insults. My my, you are getting a head of steam up today. Please don't give your flawed diagnosis on my mental health this time.
At least you haven't got any secrets you can spill this time. If you want to go gunning for me you need bigger bullets and a battle plan... This ain't going to do it.
Now I am going to leave you to your ranting.

Reading over this, it's a little petty. But that's how it always starts with you. If someone has the audacity to reply, retort, or Heaven forbid, ask for evidence of any kind, you go into full troll attack mode. I've had it with that. I want to talk football, not play Glory's games. You even managed to piss off Shaks so much, that even he left the forum for a rest. How you can do that to someone without a bad bone in his body? And then wonder why he's left! Did you enjoy that? Another first?

So, not wanting to get involved in your shyte again, I finally replied:

Me: No rant. I'm off.

So you really should have posted: [HASHTAG]#absolutelybloodyguilty[/HASHTAG]

And just before you start, once again, I'm off.
Click to expand...

WJ makes Glory sound like a certain Donald J Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: lifecheshirewhite
chippy / glory said:
My turn to give a diagnosis......
You have lost the plot..... If you still have the number give the Samaritans a bell.
You are seeing demons that arnt there and I was only giving as good as you were handing out in threads various and by liking any posts taking the piss (that's what it is) out of me. Not forgetting that little dig about finding trouble at the match tomorrow. I let it go at the time, but if you have something to say then bring it......


Not going to be crying about your selective citation above it tells less than half the story. What was the post you made before mine that you quoted. Nice context snipping but it's clear I was responding to something you must have said. I can't remember what beapcause I ain't sad enough to give a ****!

As for Shaks we were still talking by pm..... And there wasn't really a problem (and never has been) other than an overheating that everyone has from time to time ( yes even me). Perhaps you should ask him. Do you ever stop **** stirring and hiding behind others. Man up and just say you think I am a Cnut without hiding behind others to do it.....

The truth is you wanted everyone to be like a dog with two dicks because you were back.
Reality is that you like all of us just ain't that important to this place or those posting here.
You want to talk footie without some chat then the Internet aint the forum.
Click to expand...

Fcuk me, now Glory is making Glory sound like Donald J Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: lifecheshirewhite
the issue with Bridcutt wasn't him holding out, it was Sunderland wanting Leeds to pay off the remainder of his contract ... they wanted him out, so they were responsible for the remainder of his contract ... Sunderland were also looking for £1.5m as a transfer fee ... Leeds were refusing to pay the outstanding contract monies as they needed to balance their books to afford Bridcutt ... when these negotiations fell flat, Bridcutt agreed a lower settlement with Sunderland to get the move on track, which shows he DOES have the desire to come to Leeds ... hope the deal gets done, he was very good for us last season, and with a quality player like Hernandez in front of him to link up with we could just be on the brink of something awesome
 
BillysStatue said:
the issue with Bridcutt wasn't him holding out, it was Sunderland wanting Leeds to pay off the remainder of his contract ... they wanted him out, so they were responsible for the remainder of his contract ... Sunderland were also looking for £1.5m as a transfer fee ... Leeds were refusing to pay the outstanding contract monies as they needed to balance their books to afford Bridcutt ... when these negotiations fell flat, Bridcutt agreed a lower settlement with Sunderland to get the move on track, which shows he DOES have the desire to come to Leeds ... hope the deal gets done, he was very good for us last season, and with a quality player like Hernandez in front of him to link up with we could just be on the brink of something awesome
Click to expand...

Hey'up Billy..............peace brother.

There you have it Billy, different opinions based on what media article they read.......:emoticon-0148-yes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillysStatue
Whitejock said:
No, quite wrong. You pissed me off. In yet another targeted attack. And the disappointing thing is that you just don't see it. Or do you?

I was excited about the new season & wanted to discuss with everyone. That's why I came back. But you couldn't let the past go. An extract of the exchange:

You: Can't educate pork. I can't be responsible for explaining everything that escapes you... Life is too short.
Me: Ah, still the usual tactic. When required to provide evidence for, defend or elaborate on your opinion, you still fire a load of accusatory bluster & retreat, claiming it's everyone's fault but yours. Nothing's changed then. Why spend time explaining yourself when it's far easier to find someone else to attack?
You: Depends on the subject been (sic) discussed. But of course no opinion will be worth as much as yours! Stop hectoring, your petticoat is showing again and I don't want you flouncing off again.
You: Alternatively it's just more fun to prick your pomposity. No point eating time trying to explain to a closed mind.
Me: Pot. Kettle. Black. "They don't like it up 'em, Captain Mainwairing", to quote an apt phrase.
Me: Pompous, closed mind. Only 2 unwarranted insults so far. I guess the day is yet young.
You: Statements of my opinion not insults. My my, you are getting a head of steam up today. Please don't give your flawed diagnosis on my mental health this time.
At least you haven't got any secrets you can spill this time. If you want to go gunning for me you need bigger bullets and a battle plan... This ain't going to do it.
Now I am going to leave you to your ranting.

Reading over this, it's a little petty. But that's how it always starts with you. If someone has the audacity to reply, retort, or Heaven forbid, ask for evidence of any kind, you go into full troll attack mode. I've had it with that. I want to talk football, not play Glory's games. You even managed to piss off Shaks so much, that even he left the forum for a rest. How you can do that to someone without a bad bone in his body? And then wonder why he's left! Did you enjoy that? Another first?

So, not wanting to get involved in your shyte again, I finally replied:

Me: No rant. I'm off.

So you really should have posted: [HASHTAG]#absolutelybloodyguilty[/HASHTAG]

And just before you start, once again, I'm off.
Click to expand...

I dissected and redissected, I analysed and reanalysed, took it apart and put it back together and still couldn't find anything wrong with it......:emoticon-0148-yes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back