leave her there

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What should we do with her

  • Let the slag rot where she is?

    Votes: 25 62.5%
  • Bring her back home and lock her up

    Votes: 6 15.0%
  • Bring her back and interrogate her for info for her freedom

    Votes: 2 5.0%
  • Bring her back and give love and understanding

    Votes: 4 10.0%
  • Just give the bitch and her spawn everything she wants for free

    Votes: 2 5.0%
  • Give her the bullet

    Votes: 7 17.5%

  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I just hope that Bangladesh don’t take her either .

I really don’t care what happens to her , so long as she stays away from these shores . I maybe coming across as callous , but I really have no sympathy for her . Feel sorry a bit for her child , but her ? No .


It's a hard one to be sure.

I just think the govts motives are a bit suss. It feels like a cop out on their part for me.

The rule of law should apply imho, uncomfortable as that maybe for some
 
It's a hard one to be sure.

I just think the govts motives are a bit suss. It feels like a cop out on their part for me.

The rule of law should apply imho, uncomfortable as that maybe for some

But if , IF , part of our law is we can legally stop her coming back , that’s fine by me . Anyway , off to read something .

As has been mentioned , nice to see people sharing views without it getting nasty .

Ttfn :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefanwithnoname
I don't get this narrative tbh. Could be wrong like but hasn't most of the indoctrination been done from a distance?

As I understand it, again could be wrong, it's either likes of jihadi John who went abroad and then indoctrinated those here or others came already indoctrinated and did stuff like 9/11.

Don't know about you but leaving her free to indoctrinate others is a scary thought
It’s a very scary thought Fan, far too scary to take a risk. It’s clear that her ideology sits comfortably inside her head and this will not diminish as a result of living elsewhere.
 
Well well well, I'm watching the press preview on sky news and they are discussing the whole "you are no longer British" headlines

The political consultant Nina schlick (wid by the way) has said that as it stands becoming an isis bride is not currently prosecutable under British law.

So she is technically "innocent" as it stands, as in no laws broken. No argument against that from the newspaper bloke whose stand is same as those on here saying they are happy if she simply isn't allowed back, or the news reader dude


Only going by what's being discussed here on sky news. not sure if any legal eagles can clarify??
 
It wasn't humour mate, nor was it meant as serious (any more than the suggestion her baby should be killed made by someone), it was a statement saying "**** her, she made her choice".
If you think the 15yo poor lamb was indoctrinated to break the law what do you think of the 15yos that are in effect breaking the law by missing school to protest about climate change?
Are they just kids who have they been indoctrinated or are they intelligent and fully aware of what they are doing.

Are you seriously trying to create equivalence between a 15 yr old being indoctrinated online and then travelling half way around the globe to join a twisted death cult and getting married underage within 3 weeks of landing......

To schoolkids choosing to protest about climate change, as it’ll affect their futures? Really?

Using your ‘logic’ you can dismiss any future underage sex cases for 15 year olds, if they decide to do drugs, yeah that’s their choice, prostitution? Yeah no bother, personal choice innit. Go give you head a ****ing wobble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
QUOTE="Tel, post: 12581457, member: 1008347"]Fan, she’s not coming home bro, let this one go.
He can't quite grasp that. I hear what he's saying but she's going to have to settle for a mansion in sunny Bangladesh.[/QUOTE]

Quite. I cant understand why she would want to come back here when she could live like a queen in Bangladesh for a fiver a year...<confused>
 
This is an interesting point, how can we deport foreign criminals if other countries start disowning them?

You must log in or register to see media
 
This is an interesting point, how can we deport foreign criminals if other countries start disowning them?

You must log in or register to see media
Yup, the U.K. govt has just shown other countries how to do it. Going to cause a **** storm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Excellent news.

Wet liberals and terrorist sympathisers across the country are weeping this morning!

That's nonsense, nobody wanted her to get away with this people just wanted the letter of the law applied, now if there is a legal way for her to removed as a UK citizen then fine. Branding people terrorist sympathisers because they don't want to become some kind of watered down version of ISIS is a low blow.
 
Yup, the U.K. govt has just shown other countries how to do it. Going to cause a **** storm.

This is going to cause the biggest shhite storm ever, I think even the British Media are starting to run scared of it, knowing Sajid Javid has fooked up big time, not forgetting he was born to parents of Pakistani descent - he better hope he never commits a crime <whistle>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.