I get what you mean but in the end surely the law has to prevail?
leave her there
- Thread starter Rorschach
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I get what you mean but in the end surely the law has to prevail?
D
Deleted.......
Guest
I'd prefer nobody to be hacking anyone's heads off.
I'm sure it will mate. I don't agree with it though.
[HASHTAG]#metoo[/HASHTAG]
But if you cannot resist the urge to execute someone to make a
statement to the world, at least get a pro who can do it humanely eh.
That is fair enough. Tbh reading some of the stuff on this thread has me thinking wtf
It's hard to say what is right and wrong in all this, but imho some of the comments are right out of the isis handbook
She'll feel at home with that then.
It is their problem until they decide what they want to do with her.
If they want to deport her to the uk then fine, we should take her back.
What we shouldnt be doing is deliberately flying planes and sending people out to "rescue" her.
For me radicalisation is still ripe and as active as ever. This girl left the UK in some sort of dream that she was joining the holy war, doing her bit for the mighty ISIL against the Kafir's of the world, after all the word of Abu Bakr was their belief that the light was shining on them.
I do think imo that she should be interrogated on Syrian soil by the British simply because any crimes she committed would have been against enemies of ISIL on Syrian soil. The only way she should be allowed back in Britain is to serve many years in prison for her disrespect and treason against the very Country that probably salvaged her parents out of a skip and gave them the chance of a decent life..
I do think imo that she should be interrogated on Syrian soil by the British simply because any crimes she committed would have been against enemies of ISIL on Syrian soil. The only way she should be allowed back in Britain is to serve many years in prison for her disrespect and treason against the very Country that probably salvaged her parents out of a skip and gave them the chance of a decent life..
No mate. I'm not bypassing anything. I think it was yesterday they said she was a British citizen and can not be made stateless. That's how the law stands at the moment
As blueman says we may not like it but it is what it is
Also my comments are in relation to the comments about killing the baby. To say that is scary **** for me
The biological father of her new child is/was Nederlands.
Let them take her (they are full "right on" over there) .
For me radicalisation is still ripe and as active as ever. This girl left the UK in some sort of dream that she was joining the holy war, doing her bit for the mighty ISIL against the Kafir's of the world, after all the word of Abu Bakr was their belief that the light was shining on them.
I do think imo that she should be interrogated on Syrian soil by the British simply because any crimes she committed would have been against enemies of ISIL on Syrian soil. The only way she should be allowed back in Britain is to serve many years in prison for her disrespect and treason against the very Country that probably salvaged her parents out of a skip and gave them the chance of a decent life..
I agree with most of this.
Disagree with the skip and salvaging of parents. I'm the son of an immigrant and have had that aimed at me too by some right wing nutters. There is a lot of history behind some of the "skips" and why they became skips. And in my personal case my family were very well to do before my old man came here
I was reading yesterday that all her kids are or were with the Dutch guy. She is still married to him and he is in captivity now
One person said that, while pthers have said they will anything they can to prevent her returning.
She is a terrorist, she may not have killed, but she went to breed to make more terrorists, She has given up her rights once she turned her back on the country, to go and breed with terrorists.
Yes but let’s pretend for a second we aren’t overly dramatic types who haven’t read beyond the headline. A lot of people have suggested she should face a trial and be imprisoned there. If she is and does a few years (maybe more, **** knows) would people then think it’s right she came back here? I’d guess not, but would be interested to know.
Wrong fam, the yanks blew his sorry arse 2 years ago...This one could be anyones.
The thing is Comm, we don't know whether she killed or not. At the very least though, she supported it.
- Status