Le Pen

OK Kevin I've got this

You live in Gillingham with your beautiful wife and 8 year old child.
War has broken out in UK and fanatical Christians are fighting the government raping and beheading people outside Sports Direct.

You would be safe in France Germany Poland and Hungary and Greece but Turkey would be your ideal place because they would process your papers to be reunited with your beloved wife and child.

Why wouldn't you just bring them with you and all claim asylum in France together ?

If you loved them how could you leave them to the Christian rape gangs to fend for themselves?

Yes I know you don't live in ****ing Gillingham before you say it.

I don't know the figures for French application rejections, I'm imagining it's quite high. Maybe research that and come back to me, as I explained to Aldo I gave the reason not the why's.
 
I don't know the figures for French application rejections, I'm imagining it's quite high. Maybe research that and come back to me, as I explained to Aldo I gave the reason not the why's.
Men don't leave their vulnerable children in a war zone to die .
You flee as a family to the first safe place together.
 
So you leave them to stay and die ?

No...if you was in search of food and water, would you travel miles to find it or send your 3 year old child, by your reckoning I guess you would.

Well unless you take your child into the midday sun to dehydrate with you.
 
Men don't leave their vulnerable children in a war zone to die .
You flee as a family to the first safe place together.

When a soldier goes to war, does he take his family with him, or do the family just hope they can be reunited later?
 
No...if you was in search of food and water, would you travel miles to find it or send your 3 year old child, by your reckoning I guess you would.

Well unless you take your child into the midday sun to dehydrate with you.
If you needed to find water and your house was being bombed and Isis were cutting off heads.
No I wouldn't send a 3 year old child out to find food and water.
I would leave my dangerous house and take the baby with me .
I wouldn't travel miles to find water then take it back each day I would go to the place with food and water and stay there.
 
When a soldier goes to war, does he take his family with him, or do the family just hope they can be reunited later?
You are a special kind of idiot Kevin, people go to war as a job if you are a soldier .
 
Ok let's try this another way Si.

We're there families in the French camps?
 
It was your hypothetical you ****ing mong.
No I'm not a migrant from a war torn country Kevin.

No you are of good financial wealth and have your head stuck up your arse.

You have no ****ing idea what it is like to be in their situation.
 
Most of the migrants are men aged between 19 to 30 most are from countries that are not at war most don't have wives or children most come for an easier life I phones sky sports and Nike shoes.
 
Most of the migrants are men aged between 19 to 30 most are from countries that are not at war most don't have wives or children most come for an easier life I phones sky sports and Nike shoes.

And how do you know that?
 
If you needed to find water and your house was being bombed and Isis were cutting off heads.
No I wouldn't send a 3 year old child out to find food and water.
I would leave my dangerous house and take the baby with me .
I wouldn't travel miles to find water then take it back each day I would go to the place with food and water and stay there.
Stupid brits sending their kids away during the blitz to safty
 
Ok I had a quick look at immigration rules for the UK, for some reason children are treated differently to adults, and it appears we favour adults with extended families joining them, rather than visa versa.

If a Child enters the UK it is already considered safe and not entitled to be reunited with it's family. However, if an adult enters the UK it is permitted more or less immediately to bring it's extended family, particularly from war torn counties, hence for some reason our immigration is more favourable in those circumstances.

Yet according to the red Cross, they wish the UK to change it's rules so a child can be reunited with it's family. Therefore our immigration of children is described as appalling, some ridiculous low number undertook this route, which might explain why the men are coming alone, reading through the minefield of immigration rules and differences compared to other member states.

The above came from government sites and the red cross, the best I could break it down, not media sources. A lot of media sources seem to denounce French immigration handling, so I avoided this route, even though it would have benefited my point but it distracted from my original suggestion of why men come here.

On a separate note reports and surveys I found while searching suggested my theory that immigrants are not coming to the UK for benefits and there is no evidence to support otherwise. Yes they may get benefits but that is not a primary reason.
 
Last edited: