Exactly!
I’m 100% with awjm on this one, the whole plagiarism/due credit angle has been totally overstated here IMO.
The beauty of this board for me is that it’s a one-stop shop for all things QPR. If I want to wade through a hundred different outside websites for the briefest mention of anything to do with QPR, what with all with their own ads and cookies and pop-ups, then I can do that. That’s what Google is for, I don’t need someone to post a link.
As far as I’m concerned, if something’s posted on the internet that relates to my club, and it isn’t behind a pay-wall, then it’s fair game. That whole freedom of information is the lifeblood of the internet. Otherwise, there does it stop? If someone starts talking about a piece from Sky Sports News am I supposed to not read it unless I get out a satellite subscription?
The cream rises to the top. If an article is well written, or comes from someone with reliable sources, then my interest will the pricked and I’ll want to read further at the writers home internet domain. For example, I now regularly visit the West London Sport website, having first seen several good articles copied and pasted from it to this board. To be honest, most QPR related articles taken from the web I would almost certainly have never seen at all had they not been posted, in full, on this board.