Never had the need to make up a reason to ban you Dai, you give us plenty of ammo. I banned you twice for threats, and threats is one thing I will not tolerate on any level if I see them. Funnily enough though, those threats never came to light after you were banned funnily enough, guess it went to prove (both times) that you talk a lot of rubbish. And I didn't say I was going to ban you, take your tin foil hat off will you lol. I said that if we were to mod fairly, you would not be here, your constant abuse aimed at people would have seen you permanently banned along time ago. Yes it would result in others being banned, but there is normally always one common denominator, and that is you. So be careful what you wish for. Take this scenario as an example. User 1 and user 2 insult = both get banned user 1 and user 3 insult = both get banned user 1 and user 4 insult = both get banned User 1 insults user 5 = User 1 gets banned User 3 and user 2 insult = both get banned Now yes more than 1 user is involved, however like I said, there is normally one person who is involved most of the time, and that is you. So, yes we could ban all 4 users in the scenario, but on a totting up scenario, you would have been banned for a lot longer than the other 3 users. And you have been banned how many times now, as for the more recent bans that I gave you. the next time it is because of another threat you make, it will result in a weeks ban, because you have been banned for it twice already. And there won't be a 4th temporary ban if you threaten again.
Dai you get banned for insulting people or making threats. You have never been banned without just cause.
Absolute rubbish.you ban me but ignore any abuse i get....get it right Its well known that is the case just from the number of pm i get..Even lib have had a go at the way i have been treated and roof before now and i have more arguments with them than anyone....get your facts right you abuse your powers against certain posters especially me...FACT
A Champions League team next season ......http://uk.soccerway.com/national/switzerland/super-league/20132014/regular-season/r21467/
For the record, your last two bans were not for abuse you annoying old man. So get it right I ignore the abuse you get, just like I ignore the abuse you send in the same topics. I do however step in when you have gone to far by abusing posters who did not abuse you, such as the recent issue with trundles, or are you going to deny that and force me to go get all the quotes, seeing as your always innocent remember. It is however hard to step in when your abused after not abusing them, do you want to know why that is, its because you have abused/insulted so many bloody people, its hard to keep track. Your a back and forth kinda guy, so man the hell up. Other members give you as good as they get, as you tend to be the one who starts the insults anyway, you have pissed off plenty of other members, of which I have had plenty of messages too (seeing as we are playing that game) or is this another case like your claims your good buddies with Mick, and that any ban would result in us losing our mod role, well guess what Dai, I still have my mod role, because like usual, you talk through your arse. You have probably never had a PM, you just sit there and make **** up to make you feel like you are important, when we all know, your not. This is what I was on about earlier see Dai, you love to insult, but never like to admit you do. Which is why I said earlier that if I was to be totally fair, you would have been gone a long time ago, it wasn't a threat, it was a fact, and we all know how much you love dealing with facts, so be a good lad, and shove that fact where the sun don't shine. Man up to your own faults, stop blaming others, and quit your bitching.
Swansea is a grreat gig for managers...the team and the way they play teaches managers a lot .All our managers have been lucky to be with us imo .
It is obvious that this whole thread has been put up to goad Dai. Just look at the title of the post. It's meant to get Dai answering back so that all the usual suspects can gang up on him. What is the point of this thread? There opposing Laudrup camps on here won't change their minds, so what's the point going over the same arguments for months. Dai brings much needed debate to this forum and it would be a bad day if he was driven out by the usual bully boys.
OK you are pissing me off now. "The point" of this thread concerns the next job our ex manager might take (who's only been gone 4 months). It says "Just for Dai" in the title because of the stance he took on this subject. As has already been explained....to which you said you agreed I, and everyone else, could debate what we want. In case you haven't noticed; the debate has continued for eleven pages now. Either contribute or **** off and create your own thread....make sure it has a point that is up to my high standards though You are derailing my thread which concerns a legitimate subject on an open football forum for Swansea City and trying to stifle free debate. "bully boys"? I've defended Dai's right to post on this forum to the hilt in the past....the only time I've complained and asked for a temporary ban was in the run up to Christmas when Dai came on here everyday and posted on every thread (regardless of the subject matter) anti Laudrup attacks....meaning that nobody could debate what they wanted to debate as every thread turned into the Dai show. I don't want Dai banned but if he is going to post personal attacks, untruths and talk down to people whilst his posts are littered with comical mistakes and hypocrisy then he is going to get a response from me. This is not Dai's forum. We are not dancing to his tune. He can dance to the majority's. Can I ask the mods that if this character is not going to debate on the subject of 'Laudrup's Career Prospects' that his attempts to derail are removed? If he wants to debate the quality of my threads/posts or muse on the subject of "Terrorwit's a bully" he can make his own thread and I may or may not contribute. Thank-you.
