So, youngsters can't be internationalists, having youngsters negates internationalists and the players who played against Brechin don't count?
I give up.
That **** is out-Medroing Medro
Latest transfer targets
- Thread starter Otto Flayshow
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
That **** is out-Medroing Medro
According to The Express:
Cammy Bell
David Templeton
Daniel Larsson
and trialist Michael Fink to be offered contract.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/342844
What type of money would Vlad ask for Templeton.
Decent player but I don't think we've a hope in hell of gettin him.
bocanegra
in context, brechin had 2 plumbers playing who represented scotland at ammies level a few years back
you dont need these players
in context, brechin had 2 plumbers playing who represented scotland at ammies level a few years back
you dont need these players
So, youngsters can't be internationalists, having youngsters negates internationalists and the players who played against Brechin don't count?
I give up.
You need to learn to read.
Go back and give it another go...
Perhaps the beel is affecting your eye sight
I said I'm not getting dragged intae this nonsense with you - you don't admit your wrong then try to pick faults with others' summations.
You said, in response to a list of squad players relating to a question about internationalists, "aye, but half those players are bairns".
This infers that you were using that as a qualifier or as a caveat - you made no further comment about the internationalists listed except, seperately, to suggest that the likes of Broadfoot was now away.
Don't play the whitaboot/ignore game with me ya zoomer - even if you had any "cross-party" credibility left, you just lost it with the implication that I, hungover and ****ing furiously over the CL draw @ 17:00, would be beeling.
I tell you what, just make your response to this a massive exercise in ignoring the previous post and use some vintage dodging forum patter like "you need to learn to read"
This is chapper's new tactic, post deliberately vague comments and then refuse point blank to explain them, then try and make out you are an idiot for not understanding.
He tried it with me today and he failed as badly there as he did here.
http://www.not606.com/showthread.ph...2-Days-Solid-Spanking-Their-Wee-Wangers/page3
**** me diccus, dunno if you're just trying to be pedantic or if you're just a little ******ed...
Put the kettle on folks, this could be a long un...
Ok, so here we have stereotypist claiming ranges have 25 FIRST TEAM players. Agreed?
Looks here like I'm asking who they are.
Here you claim to be happy to get involved whilst stating rangers had 10 internationals on the pitch "the other week"...
I then prompt YOU to name them...
You then take it upon yourself to answer the question i put to stereotypist.
To which I reply...
My favorite Internet taig then answers your question for you although only comes up with 8.
You then try to make up the difference with two more, however, ioannidis hasn't been capped for Greece AND hasn't played for rangers (certainly didn't "the other week")
Having quoted you I then say...
You then start getting confused between your questions and stereptypists (some might say because of rage/beel but I won't...)
So, to recap, I've yet to see these 25 first team players and the 10 internationals that played the other week.
And if someone can provide proof of rangers wage bill I'd be chuffed.
Now if you'll excuse me, legs are gonna be getting numb soon so I'd better go and give the old' hoop a wee wipe
Put the kettle on folks, this could be a long un...
Ok, so here we have stereotypist claiming ranges have 25 FIRST TEAM players. Agreed?
Looks here like I'm asking who they are.
I'm too happy to even be drawn into this properly.
Who are the favourites in SFL1?
I'm not sure as I'm not too up on my diddy leagues.
Are you seriously suggesting that a team that had 10 internationals on the pitch the other week are worth less than Falkirk?
Here you claim to be happy to get involved whilst stating rangers had 10 internationals on the pitch "the other week"...
I then prompt YOU to name them...
GK Neil Alexander
GK Scott Gallacher
DF Carlos Bocanegra (captain)
DF Darren Cole
DF EmÃlson Cribari
DF Sébastien Faure
DF Chris Hegarty
DF Ross Perry
DF Lee Wallace
DF Anestis Argyriou
MF Ian Black
MF Matty Clarke
MF Robbie Crawford
MF Kyle Hutton
MF Lewis MacLeod
MF Lee McCulloch
MF Andrew Mitchell
MF Dean Shiels
MF Kamil Wiktorski
FW Kane Hemmings
FW Kevin Kyle
FW Andrew Little
FW Barrie McKay
FW Kal Naismith
FW Francisco Sandaza
That's from Wiki - 25
Yer aw arseholes more than ears
You then take it upon yourself to answer the question i put to stereotypist.
To which I reply...
broadfoot, black, wallace, bedoya, goian (gone hee hee sorry), sheils, alexander, mcculloch,
not 10 admitedly and not all current though
still wasted wages imo
My favorite Internet taig then answers your question for you although only comes up with 8.
Andy Little
Ioannidis
You then try to make up the difference with two more, however, ioannidis hasn't been capped for Greece AND hasn't played for rangers (certainly didn't "the other week")
Having quoted you I then say...
So, youngsters can't be internationalists, having youngsters negates internationalists and the players who played against Brechin don't count?
I give up.
You then start getting confused between your questions and stereptypists (some might say because of rage/beel but I won't...)
I said I'm not getting dragged intae this nonsense with you - you don't admit your wrong then try to pick faults with others' summations.
MMM, YOU JUST SAID YOU WERE "TOO HAPPY TO GET INVOLVED"
You said, in response to a list of squad players relating to a question about internationalists, "aye, but half those players are bairns".
THIS IS INCORRECT, AS STATED ABOVE, I WAS REFERRING TO TWO SETS OF QUESTIONS WHICH I QUOTED SEPERATE AND EVERYTHING!
This infers that you were using that as a qualifier or as a caveat - you made no further comment about the internationalists listed except, seperately, to suggest that the likes of Broadfoot was now away.
IT DOESN'T INFER ANYTHING, IT IS THERE IN BLACK & WHITE.
Don't play the whitaboot/ignore game with me ya zoomer - even if you had any "cross-party" credibility left, you just lost it with the implication that I, hungover and ****ing furiously over the CL draw @ 17:00, would be beeling.
DID I IMPLY THAT YOU WERE HUNGOVER AND ****ING OVER A CL DRAW?
I tell you what, just make your response to this a massive exercise in ignoring the previous post and use some vintage dodging forum patter like "you need to learn to read"
So, to recap, I've yet to see these 25 first team players and the 10 internationals that played the other week.
And if someone can provide proof of rangers wage bill I'd be chuffed.
Now if you'll excuse me, legs are gonna be getting numb soon so I'd better go and give the old' hoop a wee wipe
Actually just gonna head over there in a bit to see what ****e you're saying now...
Trying desperately to not get involved.
Well done on the longest pile of ****e post ever.
You asked questions - you got answers.
You have 25 squad players.
No-one said they all played the other week.
You have had several internationalists in your squad - we were able to name 10 at least between myself and Simon (Ioannidis was trumpeted by the papers as an internationalist) and Argyriou has played U20.
You ARE another Medro - ask annoying questions without answering anything.
It's pretty pathetic.
Do you honestly believe your wage bill is smaller than PTFCs, for example?
Nah, you'd rather not say - you'll just ask someone to get The Rangers exact wage bill.
It's rumoured (no-one has any better to go on) that some of your players are on £7k a week.
I'm willing to bet that no other team in that division has an entire wage bill that exceeds that.
The point is....
...you STILL demand more signings.
...you STILL think it's wrong for Celtic not to spunk money on players we can't afford.
If you all think like that, the new club is as doomed as the last.
It's a fairly simple concept and point of view
Well done on the longest pile of ****e post ever.
You asked questions - you got answers.
You have 25 squad players.
No-one said they all played the other week.
You have had several internationalists in your squad - we were able to name 10 at least between myself and Simon (Ioannidis was trumpeted by the papers as an internationalist) and Argyriou has played U20.
You ARE another Medro - ask annoying questions without answering anything.
It's pretty pathetic.
Do you honestly believe your wage bill is smaller than PTFCs, for example?
Nah, you'd rather not say - you'll just ask someone to get The Rangers exact wage bill.
It's rumoured (no-one has any better to go on) that some of your players are on £7k a week.
I'm willing to bet that no other team in that division has an entire wage bill that exceeds that.
The point is....
...you STILL demand more signings.
...you STILL think it's wrong for Celtic not to spunk money on players we can't afford.
If you all think like that, the new club is as doomed as the last.
It's a fairly simple concept and point of view
From what i have saw rangers problems is the type of players they are signing. A bunch of mercenaries instead of hungry players.
I honestly don't know why Rangers just do what Gretna did, buy a core of Scottish players, mostly from the SPL and SFL1, that would be more than enough to swan the league the next two seasons.
They guys they have signed seem to be purely for the exotic value alone, none of the players they have signed are of any real note and not only do they have the initial culture shock of a new country to live and work in, they have the double whammy of having to play in the lowest tier of Scottish Football and the pishy wee grounds therein.
I may be wrong but I doubt more than 3 of these foreigners will play a big part in Rangers' season.
They guys they have signed seem to be purely for the exotic value alone, none of the players they have signed are of any real note and not only do they have the initial culture shock of a new country to live and work in, they have the double whammy of having to play in the lowest tier of Scottish Football and the pishy wee grounds therein.
I may be wrong but I doubt more than 3 of these foreigners will play a big part in Rangers' season.
Just spotted this beauty from the Gun Bunny
Sorry, but our chaps just pissed (with ease) all over a team from the higher echelons (sic) of Scottish football. The "foreigners" performed very well, especially the French lad.
By the way, when you say signing chaps for "exotic value", can you just run a wee line or 2 with regard to what you mean?
So yes, all in all, you basically were wrong
bids in for Templeton and McGowan of Hearts according to John Robertson,
don't know why they would come, especially McGowan who is now being considered for his national team.
But I hope they do, 2 very good players.
don't know why they would come, especially McGowan who is now being considered for his national team.
But I hope they do, 2 very good players.