Off Topic kuntoff semi final 2

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

kunt

  • comm

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • stan

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • cfc ffp

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • ginge

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • metths

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Brb

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    1
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tobes said:
That twitter account names no ****er, ok any screenshot posts should be taken down, but to insist on it being deleted is pure bollocks and **** all to do with this site and it’s members

Some cry arsing ****s behind the scenes again, plus an over zealous mod who’s been itching to ban Stan for weeks. Yet more horse **** here.
Click to expand...

Load of crap, Stan has been told many times by brb to stop being a sad act stalker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD and Born again Humanitarian
Tobes said:
That twitter account names no ****er, ok any screenshot posts should be taken down, but to insist on it being deleted is pure bollocks and **** all to do with this site and it’s members

Some cry arsing ****s behind the scenes again, plus an over zealous mod who’s been itching to ban Stan for weeks. Yet more horse **** here.
Click to expand...

I've said for weeks he was stalking, and to add to your earlier comment it was more than just Pete as though that's not bad enough.

Other references were made to DMD and Moggy and a few others i forget.

Obviously if you are saying it is ok to create a twitter parody to stalk people on here, then i really would hope you reconsider thought. Especially for someone so touchy about something as simple as an East Riding hashtag.

Oh and btw who is the account 'One for the lads' that was stalking Pete and Co to, that became immediately active on Stan's banning!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DUNCAN DONUTS, DMD, HRH Custard VC and 1 other person
brb said:
I've said for weeks he was stalking, and to add to your earlier comment it was more than just Pete as though that's not bad enough.

Other references were made to DMD and Moggy and a few others i forget.

Obviously if you are saying it is ok to create a twitter parody to stalk people on here, then i really would hope you reconsider thought. Especially for someone so touchy about something as simple as an East Riding hashtag.

Oh and btw who is the account 'One for the lads' that was stalking Pete and Co to, that became immediately active on Stan's banning!
Click to expand...

Unlock the poll<laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks
brb said:
I've said for weeks he was stalking, and to add to your earlier comment it was more than just Pete as though that's not bad enough.

Other references were made to DMD and Moggy and a few others i forget.

Obviously if you are saying it is ok to create a twitter parody to stalk people on here, then i really would hope you reconsider thought. Especially for someone so touchy about something as simple as an East Riding hashtag.

Oh and btw who is the account 'One for the lads' that was stalking Pete and Co to, that became immediately active on Stan's banning!
Click to expand...
Who cares if he’s referenced random anonymous user names on here? They mean **** all to anyone.

The only name that is real is that of Saxton and you still allow him to post on here doing so, since when does this site operate in an internet bubble?

Your veiled threat means jack **** btw, as I’m also an anonymous user, unless you’re intimating a doxxing..
 
Tobes said:
Who cares if he’s referenced random anonymous user names on here? They mean **** all to anyone.

The only name that is real is that of Saxton and you still allow him to post on here doing so, since when does this site operate in an internet bubble?

Your veiled threat means jack **** btw, as I’m also an anonymous user, unless you’re intimating a doxxing..
Click to expand...

Stan is making references to a lot of people on this forum including me, sorry but i consider that to be overstepping boundaries.

I made it quite clear he was stalking. I am who i am on here, i do not pretend to be anyone else with socks or parody.

You find it acceptable, i do not. Im sure if it was to be aimed at you, you would not find it acceptable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD, HRH Custard VC and Born again Humanitarian
Tobes said:
Who cares if he’s referenced random anonymous user names on here? They mean **** all to anyone.

The only name that is real is that of Saxton and you still allow him to post on here doing so, since when does this site operate in an internet bubble?

Your veiled threat means jack **** btw, as I’m also an anonymous user, unless you’re intimating a doxxing..
Click to expand...
Some mean a lot to you as you are clearly acting like a teenage emo girl going through the heartache of a break up
 
  • Like
Reactions: DUNCAN DONUTS, DMD and HRH Custard VC
brb said:
Right this the last word I'm saying on this...

Stan is banned, I knew he was stalking, personally I find that unacceptable, he admitted in so many words tonight it was him and therefore is banned until such time i'm happy that account is deleted. I can't force him to do anything but the choice is simple. I will not be engaging in any further conversation on the matter.
Click to expand...

Good job he admitted it then because, what will you do if someone sets up a twitter account, posts stuff from here on it, then tries to make it look like someone else on here did it?

Is there a way you can find out from the twitter mods who is who from this site and vice versa?
 
pompeymeowth said:
Good job he admitted it then because, what will you do if someone sets up a twitter account, posts stuff from here on it, then tries to make it look like someone else on here did it?

Is there a way you can find out from the twitter mods who is who from this site and vice versa?
Click to expand...

Twitter is nothing to do with me. However, i was made aware privately that a forum member was targeting people off this site.

I approached twitter first, they are investigating the matter, their words not mine.

In the meantime after i done my own checks to validate the claims i decided to take my own action internally.

To which i was immediately targeted by Stan's 606 sock, which had also been stalking people and i also banned that account.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
brb said:
Twitter is nothing to do with me. However, i was made aware privately that a forum member was targeting people off this site.

I approached twitter first, they are investigating the matter, their words not mine.

In the meantime after i done my own checks to validate the claims i decided to take my own action internally.

To which i was immediately targeted by Stan's 606 sock, which had also been stalking people and i also banned that account.
Click to expand...

which sock was that, he has a few
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD and brb
HRH Custard VC said:
which sock was that, he has a few
Click to expand...

I doubt he can remember the other socks, or he's protecting them, because he resorted to creating a new account which i have captured the details and blotted him out the system.

If you have details of any other socks that he's using please give me the usernames and i will ban everyone of them <ok>
 
brb said:
I doubt he can remember the other socks, or he's protecting them, because he resorted to creating a new account which i have captured the details and blotted him out the system.

If you have details of any other socks that he's using please give me the usernames and i will ban everyone of them <ok>
Click to expand...

I think redorder was his
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back