Suarez.
I was thinking Suarez but then, how can it not be Rush?

It's like Sophie's choice
Only seen 3 of them really so between Torres Suarez and fowler.
Suarez def best all rounder... but fowler was my childhood hero! In our current team, no doubting that Suarez would fit in best. Suarez firm Mane up top with Cout Hendo Lallana behind.
Hard to not choose Rush or Fowler but has to be Suarez![]()
Suarez is the better all round player. Rush and Fowler were better finishers than Suarez, but not much more to their game. Keegan was good and I would probably rate him behind Suarez as he had a good all round game.
Suarez is the better all round player. Rush and Fowler were better finishers than Suarez, but not much more to their game. Keegan was good and I would probably rate him behind Suarez as he had a good all round game.

How come you picked hunt ahead of Owen as a choice?
Is it the obvious judist reason lol or too many of our generation and not enough old school options?
Rush was one of our better defenders at the time and quite often an attack started from him clearing the ball. Put balloteli and sturridge to shame the lazy ****s!I never really saw rush but I always thought he was a real hard worker from the front in terms of closing down and defending?
If you are looking at that lot.
1. Torres, needed a pass but was a chance a goal for us for a while.
2. Keegan. Yeah but no. Dynamic player with tosh acknowledge and a top top player.
3.rush. goal scorer and pace but.... needed Dalglish.. why is Dalglish not there...
4. Hunt. Can't say tbh
5. Fowler. No. Fast, brilliant brilliant finisher. But outside box ot so great.
So yes it's suarez first then keegan then rush then fowler.
Simply put suarez could make his own chance.
Torres could make his own chances too, just needed a bit of space to do it.
So could Owen who was omitted.Torres could make his own chances too, just needed a bit of space to do it.