What happened? The euphoria of the away win at Watford to the gloom of the home debacle against Rotherham?
How things can change. Is it right to throw doubt on Slade in that short space of time, or have the doubts been there for many long before that?
A totally different proposition from the boyish Solskjaer, and seems to command the respect of at least the players he favours, if not that of a fairly hefty chunk of the squad that he doesn't. He cuts an avuncular figure that talks a very good fight to the media and comes across as the steadying influence that we needed, but is he the right guy to manage this club back to the top tier?
We've all argued that the guy needs time, but for me it's not just been that cringeworthy performance last Saturday - it's something I've felt for a while. I expected more by now from a guy who was virtually headhunted and pursued by Tan from another club rather than going for readily available option like Pulis. I've said on this forum earlier this week that I haven't seen a decent half hour of football from City since he's been here and I stand by that. Our much vaunted 4 home wins since he arrived were scrappy in the extreme and not gained through good football.
What has been evident so far is that whatever stability he's brought to the club has been offset by the lack of ambition he's shown in taking the staid approach every time - in fact stabilty to him seems to revolve around the boring mark. It's all been said before - the persistent use of 4-4-2, the dropping of Fabio (even for home games), the constant ommission of the likes of Daehli and Morrison to change things around - all these things and more have perplexed a lot of supporters.
I suppose it's much about the fickleness of fans to the extent that a win at Bournemouth would raise him the the rank of Messiah again, whereas a defeat would condemn him to stoning.
Is it still too early to judge Slade or are we trying to hold on the the old KTF mantra?
How things can change. Is it right to throw doubt on Slade in that short space of time, or have the doubts been there for many long before that?
A totally different proposition from the boyish Solskjaer, and seems to command the respect of at least the players he favours, if not that of a fairly hefty chunk of the squad that he doesn't. He cuts an avuncular figure that talks a very good fight to the media and comes across as the steadying influence that we needed, but is he the right guy to manage this club back to the top tier?
We've all argued that the guy needs time, but for me it's not just been that cringeworthy performance last Saturday - it's something I've felt for a while. I expected more by now from a guy who was virtually headhunted and pursued by Tan from another club rather than going for readily available option like Pulis. I've said on this forum earlier this week that I haven't seen a decent half hour of football from City since he's been here and I stand by that. Our much vaunted 4 home wins since he arrived were scrappy in the extreme and not gained through good football.
What has been evident so far is that whatever stability he's brought to the club has been offset by the lack of ambition he's shown in taking the staid approach every time - in fact stabilty to him seems to revolve around the boring mark. It's all been said before - the persistent use of 4-4-2, the dropping of Fabio (even for home games), the constant ommission of the likes of Daehli and Morrison to change things around - all these things and more have perplexed a lot of supporters.
I suppose it's much about the fickleness of fans to the extent that a win at Bournemouth would raise him the the rank of Messiah again, whereas a defeat would condemn him to stoning.
Is it still too early to judge Slade or are we trying to hold on the the old KTF mantra?


