True although I'd prefer he didn't. Interesting were all assuming it'll be for redmond though. I'd probably drop Pilks not because he was bad (I don't think either should go) bit because he wasn't as good as redmond.
Jonny Howson
- Thread starter Walsh.i.am
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
True although I'd prefer he didn't. Interesting were all assuming it'll be for redmond though. I'd probably drop Pilks not because he was bad (I don't think either should go) bit because he wasn't as good as redmond.
The only problem with dropping pilks is Redmond would then be moved over to the left. I think he is far more effective on the right. He put in some decent crosses against ManC and it means he's less likely to shoot!
Redmond is improving all the time, but he has to develop that ability to make the right decision when the time comes. Both Snods and Pilks get that right far more often. Having said that though, I think Nathan had his best game yet against ManCity and should keep his place. Pilks is still struggling for fitness, so I'd go with Redmond and Snods if the latter is fit.
Keep the same team and bring snodgrass on at 70 mins and make the fecker work for his place. Let's get the best out of them- it's too easy to include snodgrass and he only makes the most chances cos he unbalances the team
I'd hope we keep the same starting 11. Great performance on Saturday, everyone deserves their place and Snodgrass is a handy player to have on the bench.
He's certainly had plenty of 'off-field' stuff going on this season, which may partly explain why his performances are by and large not up to last year's. Pikey invasions, a new baby, pregnant g/f driving through plate glass windows....and those are just the ones we know about !!
