This post could land you in big trouble dragon and the mods for letting it on here...Beware its slanderous and someone else got a huge fine and threatened with jail only the other week....watch yourselves...
I welcome your big trouble Dai, so stick a sock in it, we do not need this crook anywhere near our club, or his cronies and I call into question Huw Jenkins and our board for getting into discussions with such disreputable character from across the atlantic, the way I see it they can bugger off, there are plenty more documents and articles on John Moores that call into question his character................
watch yourself as many have landed themselves in hot water for less......You have made a statement and called someone a crook.....you cant do that and if this gets pointed out by someone connected with moore then i would not like to be in your shoes or anyone who runs this site....if you had said allegedly a crook then that would be fine but you are stating a fact and you will find you cant do that.
If Valley thinks I have over stepped the mark then he can put your 'alleged' in the heading but in my book the guy is a crook that was let of the hook by his mates in high places in the city, the world might be overflowing with them but we do not need them at our club!..............
It's got nothing to do with blame, Valley is the mod (you should know you have been banned by him enough) if he thinks anything I have put up is questionable then it's for him to put right, he's not shy as you well know...............
I'm only giving some advice and stating the obvious when you slander someone on any forum, but anyone can say what they want it's up to them....
Don't be an idiot all your life Dai! Moores makes Tan look like Terry Scott or George Roper in comparrison . We're going to marry the fiscal equivalent of Peter Sutcliffe! do you think you can grasp that?
Just to shut Dai up its done Phillip Dai go and tell your mate and his business partners we think they're a bunch of pricks for even considering allowing these Yanks anywhere near our club
Cheers Valley I wouldn't want to get anyone in trouble, but I also would have no trouble in going up to Moores and telling him man to man what a crook he is, and why he can bugger off, anyway to me it's starting to look like 'Jack to a king, and back again'.............
what is the matter with you two idiots Im only pointing out the error that could get you into trouble,,you should know this valley being a mod so get off your high horse as i dont deserve this rubbish for being helpful.....I wont bother next time
I agree. I don't like the look of these guys one bit but prosecutions have taken place for saying things on Twitter and this stuff is libel. Mr Miggins agrees with Dragon so he's my scapegoat.
We have not done a deal with anyone yet but if the club decides to do a deal then you can be sure it will be done in the best interest of the club.
I hope that you are right Dai. That said, the people doing the deal are potentially the ones selling some or all of their shareholding - so a (potential) conflict of interest.
Most decisions at any club are taken for the best interests of the club. They don't always turn out to be the right decisions. I'm worried.
there will have to be at least two members of the board that will sell as no individual has 30% shares.....I wonder how much each share costs... I hope it does not effect the trust to much as we will have to match the share price if they have risen a great deal or forfeit some of the shares if the trust cant afford the extra money to keep all the 21% I know we have some money in the bank but how much i dont have a clue...
