Oh **** off TWF. Go play with your leggo. The fact is, as stated by witnesses, Barmby noted that Bullard was lazy (which is completely true, I don't remember him doing naff all this game) and Bullard thought "I'll have you!" A childish response for a child of a man. Now please go crawl back up mr bullards arse and stay there for the foreseeable future.
Honestly i don't think been great at football should get the ridiculas amount of money most footballers get
Jimmy is the one of the biggest spin doctors to walk this Earth, he's just telling the Ipswich fans what they want to hear and they are eating it right out of his hand. We'll see how loyal he is too his words when some premier league team comes knocking at his door with a larger wage packet than the one he can get at Ipswich.
Let the crippled lamebrain rot .Even if it cost us 5 mil I'd be happy to never see him play for anyone for the next two seasons.Let him go on the Piss and frazzle the rest of his brains.
Was it because the Weir hadn't called "Last Orders'", that Jimmy thought was a rush? A "source" told me!!
Do you have some sort of penis envy regarding Bullards salary, or, is it castration anxiety? All you seem to think about is his earnings! How often does it have to be said to you, before you absorb the information? He was not asked to take a wage cut, he was asked to take a wage deferral, there is a big difference between the two (over ã2+ million, using your example). If he had taken a wage deferral, the outstanding salary would have been paid in full to him at an agreed date in the future, and, obviously, if he had agreed to take a pay cut (which he was never asked to do) he would have forgone the difference between his original salary, and the "new" agreed salary (again, using your example, ã2+ million). You know it amazes me how "****ing stupid" some fans are when it comes to not being able to read, and understand, basic English!! I leave you with this simple explanation of the difference between the two situation, and with Rosie's best wishes, FOADYC. Yours, as always, Sagegee.
Barmby was pissed off because he'd just played alongside Jimmy for an hour in a 5-1 pasting against Everton, a game in which he thought Jimmy had been a passenger. I was at that game and he didn't put in 10% of the effort that Barmby did and had it been me, I might well have given him a slap too. I don't think that anyone expected Jimmy to take a 50% pay-cut, I don't believe he was ever asked to take one either, but when your employer is facing administration and you earn a decent annual salary every week, I don't think it's too much to expect that you might work out of town for a season to help them out.
So, not only is Bullard greedy, lazy, and a liar, but, he is also a thug, with no respect for himself, his club or any others in his vicinity!
TWF and to anyone else thinking about Jimmy not taking a pay cut being an option. Answer me this if you were working for a company that was having financial issues and the choices were, voluntary redunancy, where there is no guarantee you would get a new job once your unemployed, taking a wage deferment until such time as the company recovered or keeping your salary as it is and not helping the company what would you do? Show loyalty to your employers and fellow employees or just look after yourself
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/celtic/8769927.stm They should have asked him to pay his wages back for the time he was up there playing golf and getting pissed instead of training with the lads, I don't know why the club didn't take action on this at the time, he wasn't on paid leave as far as I'm aware. I think if most people took time off work to look for another job then they have to take holiday allowance. The photo I saw of him was actually him on a golf course playing but it appears he was taking a jolly to watch a golf tournament also.
Originally Posted by TigerPaul1991 That as is it maybe, but Bullard still had it in his power to take pay cut to help the club at that difficult time, and would thus pave the way for the circumstances that Adamisme mentions. Seems like the ideal scenario to me. thanks TigerPaul. I maybe wrong but didn't Kilbane renegotiate his contract to take a pay cut to help the club out during the financial issues. .................... yes they did and they (HCAFC) still ****ed him off , so why should JB take a pay cut ,just for the same to have happened to him.
How did we? He was a regular in the side, and then when we got money to sign other players ahead of him we subsidised his wages so he could go to Huddersfield and keep playing in order to continue his international career.
I don't think Killer will have any issues with the way he's been treated by us and we certainly have no issues with the way he's behaved with us, other than when he was on the pitch obviously.
