yeah well.... she was rightly set up by interviewers so she's talked herself into it. my view is it's all a bit late as when all these people.left it was known what they did and this law should have applied then. the week you are confirmed as having left. boom..
They put words into her mouth by manipulating her you think? She made her own case very difficult by supporting the execution of innocent foreigners by IS state.
no, I think they found a silly girl and just asked leading questions and she happily blabbed away. They then published im sure the most juicy stuff to make sure they got a big splash of a story. Thats what media does after all. For me you've a very silly teenager who with two others listened to total rubbish and headed off somehow (who knows how they had passports and money for ticket to turkey) at 15 you are asking for an english speaking husband in the caliphate? I fully blame the parents right there. Since then... two dead babies and a third and she's one about not regretting a thing and spouting the propaganda she's heard over the 3 or 4 years. shes's no idea what she said or what context it would be taken at home but off she ran her mouth. very very silly. But at no point am i defending her attitude, i'm just saying she's thick.
Parents are prevented from disciplining their children the way they want in this country; teachers cannot help too because of 'child abuse' legislation. Parents have responsibilities towards their children because in the end they are the one to get the blame.
I don't agree. Beating her or smacking her makes no difference to her being open to brain washing and want to run about in a burka in a fundamentalist caliphate as a baby machine for an isis fighter. No sane woman brought up to believe in the world of opportunities available to her would want that. the conditions has to be conducive to her falling into looking for this bullshit. The parents create that conducive environment. In my view there are 3 core beliefs. 1. Freedom. Am i free here? 2. Opportunity. Do i have opportunity to be what i want? 3. Do no harm. Do I believe that everyone around me has the same need for freedom and opportunity and i should not prevent them having it.
Her mother is Bangladeshi, so she is eligible for Bangladesh citizenship. Meaning the UK can strip her of her UK citizenship as she is automatically eligible for Bangladeshi under their laws and wont leave her stateless.
Of course now what will happen is she will feel vengeful towards Britain, as will her friends and family. If she has kids, they've got very little chance of not being radicalised. If all she was, was as an idiot, and not dangerous. Now she is a dangerous idiot.
You take her then ffs. Not having my council tax and bills go up to protect someone who may be a threat to this country. She made her choice. **** her!! Probably only wants to come back for free council house and benefits anyway!! No remorse! Stay where the **** she is and rot for all i care.
She's not my type. I'm reminded of the American prison system vs the Dutch prison system. The Americans throw someone in a cell to rot and the vast majority of them go right out and commit more crimes once they get out of prison. The Dutch treat the prisoners with respect and reform them and the vast majority never return to prison. Whatever children she ever has are guaranteed to be radicalised and have a vendetta against Britain now. As will she now herself will be a mascot to terrorism. If she's in Britain can at least keep an eye on her.
That child is in for a **** life if he stays with the mother, where ever they live. He is going to be open to radicalisation as she is always going to be on the more hard line of Islam even if she is rehabilitated. And if they were to come back she'd be open to attack and abuse from certain elements of the public, endangering the child and growing up in that kind of environment is going to have some negative affects. Kid sees a group of white British attacking his mother (verbally or physically (which is going to happen)) can't say that isn't going to have an impact on his view of 'Britishness'. If she was jailed, likely if she came back, then I can't see her being allowed to keep the baby in jail, no way is an 'IS terrorist' being sent to a mother and baby unit. I'd also be reluctant to let the grandparents have the Child either, clearly they're **** parents and there are many stories that the grandfather has a history of attending radical meetings. All this over Religion, what a ****ing **** show. The day God disappears the better.
Prison might actually be best place for her if you can find a crime to stick. Let her back but let her serve time. Public will forget about her by time she comes out.
How can she that she wants her son to become ISIS fighter and says that the Manchester bombing that killed 22 was justified?. ?