No, the balls happens through melting and rapid cooling only. When in a destructive environment steel will sheer and there will be small shards. Like iron filings etc, not balls that give all the appearance of something that was shaped by its own surface tension
You admitted yoursel that you think CIA where involved in the murder of JFK
Is this insanity still going?
Seriously, what would the benefit be for a Western government to destroy one of their most important financial centres?
I can just imagine the meeting of the joint chiefs of staff.
"Shall we blow up some buildings using the most elaborate plot ever imagined and blame it on some fanatical Muslim nutters?"
"Sure, why not?"

You admitted yoursel that you think CIA where involved in the murder of JFK
Sorry but I have never heard of these steel balls being found at 9/11. Can you please send me a link and I might be able to give a better explanation.
What about the other points I made?
Many benefits. What were the benefits of allowing a prestigeous liner (Lusitania) and many of its crew and passengers to die when they knew its fate. The Germans took an ad out in the New York Times before it set off warning people to not get on board as it was viewed as a legitimate target.
What are the benefits of allowing the Japanese to almost destroy a key harbour and many navy ships and personell. The Australians sent numerous warnings that a Japanese Task Force was on its way to Pearl Harbour. The Americans ignored it and allowed it to occur
All these and more ( Gulf of Tonkin - Vietnam) were used as an excuse to enter a war the American public had no previous appetite for. War is profitable. You can control markets through tailoring of information on war successes and failures. Lower bond values and share prices, buy them up and release good news and they all rise. Oil is a sideshow in this.

Maybe they were robot architects from the future who didn't like the way the Twin Towers dominated the landscape so travelled back in time, hijacked some planes and flew them into the buildings, having concealed magical, future bombs of immense heat and power about their persons.
Yeah, sounds feasible to me
You must log in or register to see images
He organised it all![]()
All these and more ( Gulf of Tonkin - Vietnam) were used as an excuse to enter a war the American public had no previous appetite for. War is profitable. You can control markets through tailoring of information on war successes and failures. Lower bond values and share prices, buy them up and release good news and they all rise. Oil is a sideshow in this.
Again, yak yak yak, ST making himself look an idiot once more

![]()
![]()
Alomost every Western county is guilty of ignoring serious terrorist threats in the last 40 years.
Japan - The sarin gas attack by the Aum cult
UK - The 7/7 bombings
UK/America - Ignored warnings by numerous people about Lockerbie; including David Yallop (again while investigating for his Carlos book)
Spain - Many, many ETA attacks
Germany - Baader Meinhof
France - The PFLP attacks in the 70's
Here endeth the lesson
Give it a rest kid. You're just making a fool of yourself.

Ok ignoring is one thing, making something up is quite another. The Gulf of Tonkin incident is a complete fabrication. It NEVER happened and got the US embroiled in Vietnam. Now why would they do that?
And flying planes into the heart of the New York financial system causing billions of pounds worth of damage, killing 3,00 people (many of who were financial experts), destroying entire financial systems and sending shares plummeting was good for the economy was it?
Seriously, every argument you put forward is debunked, you ignore it, and move on to the next outlandish theory.
It's just ridiculous.
And flying planes into the heart of the New York financial system causing billions of pounds worth of damage, killing 3,000 people (many of who were financial experts), destroying entire financial systems and sending shares plummeting was good for the economy was it?
Peer reviewed look at the subject
[video=youtube;alo2DKG-PdI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alo2DKG-PdI&playnext=1&list=PLBDDBE3D01CDB490C[/video]
To quote that fella "I do not know, we do not know if that thermite that we have found is the same thermite which has been used for melting the beams."
"We have not found any traces of conventional explosives"