Sorry but I have never heard of these steel balls being found at 9/11. Can you please send me a link and I might be able to give a better explanation. What about the other points I made?
Many benefits. What were the benefits of allowing a prestigeous liner (Lusitania) and many of its crew and passengers to die when they knew its fate. The Germans took an ad out in the New York Times before it set off warning people to not get on board as it was viewed as a legitimate target. What are the benefits of allowing the Japanese to almost destroy a key harbour and many navy ships and personell. The Australians sent numerous warnings that a Japanese Task Force was on its way to Pearl Harbour. The Americans ignored it and allowed it to occur All these and more ( Gulf of Tonkin - Vietnam) were used as an excuse to enter a war the American public had no previous appetite for. War is profitable. You can control markets through tailoring of information on war successes and failures. Lower bond values and share prices, buy them up and release good news and they all rise. Oil is a sideshow in this.
That the best you've got? I live in Aberdeen so I'm a "sheep shagger" You are astounding everyone with your Wildean wit You are showing yourself up to be an easily fooled moron. It really is true that they make up these conspiracy theories to keep ******s like you occupied. Because frankly complete ****ing idiots like you don't deserve to add your opinion to the rational progression of society. None of deny that American politics and foreign policy are largely based around a much larger and shadowy organisation as they allow us to see. However, none of us are entirely brain-damaged enough to believe that any American government would be so self-serving as to commit such an atrocity upon it's own people.
Peer reviewed look at the subject [video=youtube;alo2DKG-PdI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alo2DKG-PdI&playnext=1&list=PLBDDBE3D01CDB490C[/video]
Alomost every Western county is guilty of ignoring serious terrorist threats in the last 40 years. Japan - The sarin gas attack by the Aum cult UK - The 7/7 bombings UK/America - Ignored warnings by numerous people about Lockerbie; including David Yallop (again while investigating for his Carlos book) Spain - Many, many ETA attacks Germany - Baader Meinhof France - The PFLP attacks in the 70's Here endeth the lesson
Its a theory. How are you going to cover the people making phone calls from the planes though. If you wanna make it look like a terrorist plot your method of robots is going to be a strange anomaly in the phone calls to relatives. Again, yak yak yak, ST making himself look an idiot once more
And flying planes into the heart of the New York financial system causing billions of pounds worth of damage, killing 3,000 people (many of who were financial experts), destroying entire financial systems and sending shares plummeting was good for the economy was it? Seriously, every argument you put forward is debunked, you ignore it, and move on to the next outlandish theory. It's just ridiculous.
Ok ignoring is one thing, making something up is quite another. The Gulf of Tonkin incident is a complete fabrication. It NEVER happened and got the US embroiled in Vietnam. Now why would they do that?
Because the Americans had a clear non-Communist policy and felt that the region would be further destabilised with another Russian backed Communist dictatorship. Yes there is some intrigue there, but no more than is plain. You're the sort of **** who sees people hiding in bushes. <awaywiththefairiesmuir>
Who talked about the good of the economy. Destruction of markets has been a key element of financial terrorism that has been employed in an artificial and cyclical manner. Black monday, the depression were all artificially and deliberately created. Destruction of these markets makes the debt people and nations have got into bite, enslaves basically. Debt is controlling
Who ever said they cared about the economy? Good economy means bad economy for those who have the power. A simplistic statement but true. The government or the country dont make money from war, but those behind it do, through their oil and weapons companies. Thats the whole point. Do you know anything about the Bank of England or the Federal Reserve? And do you believe everything they told you about 9/11? Yes or No
To quote that fella "I do not know, we do not know if that thermite that we have found is the same thermite which has been used for melting the beams." "We have not found any traces of conventional explosives"
Of coure he doesnt know, It would have required a more exacting investigation but the rubble was removed, destroyed or sold on befre any could be conducted. Its presence in itself raises many questions
