They missed out that he is also #1 for defensive shoulder barges. Absolute corker last night.You must log in or register to see images
Get him signed onto a long term deal by the summer.
They missed out that he is also #1 for defensive shoulder barges. Absolute corker last night.You must log in or register to see images
Get him signed onto a long term deal by the summer.
They missed out that he is also #1 for defensive shoulder barges. Absolute corker last night.
You must log in or register to see images
Get him signed onto a long term deal by the summer.
Haaland signs 500k a week deal for 9.5 years.
And Isak is a better player. We won’t be able to offer Isak anywhere near that kind of contract. Possibly half if we need to in 2/3 years time.
Isak is now on that level, so whether we like it or not he's going to want to move at some point.
Realistically, who can afford him? Arsenal can't, man u would struggle, city probably but they've got Haaland, Liverpool is doubtful, Chelsea would easily find a way, but there squad is so big, Barca havent got a pot to piss in and Madrid dont need him.
This is a good point. We could be in a situation in 2 years where he doesn’t sign a contract extension and we want to sell him to get them proceeds but can’t.Realistically, who can afford him? Arsenal can't, man u would struggle, city probably but they've got Haaland, Liverpool is doubtful, Chelsea would easily find a way, but there squad is so big, Barca havent got a pot to piss in and Madrid dont need him.
It’s also suggests to me that Man City are in the clear on the legal case with the PL.Isak is now on that level, so whether we like it or not he's going to want to move at some point.
Yeah and they are about to sign 3 new players. That's big for a January transfer window. I bet they held back in the summer to see how things were looking with the court case and have now gone "Right then, here go!".It’s also suggests to me that Man City are in the clear on the legal case with the PL.
They wouldn’t commit that kind of contract if they where worried about being hit with points deductions or relegations.
Realistically, who can afford him? Arsenal can't, man u would struggle, city probably but they've got Haaland, Liverpool is doubtful, Chelsea would easily find a way, but there squad is so big, Barca havent got a pot to piss in and Madrid dont need him.
This.Things can change pretty fast. Liverpool for example, if Salah goes in the Summer then that's a big hole to fill on the pitch but also plenty on the wage bill so they could afford him and use him. Most of the biggest teams could move things around to accommodate a player like Isak, we just need to make sure the fees involved are enough to deter them or compensate ourselves adequately.
Haaland signs 500k a week deal for 9.5 years.
And Isak is a better player. We won’t be able to offer Isak anywhere near that kind of contract. Possibly half if we need to in 2/3 years time.
Kelly - £150k
Trippier - £120k
Targett - £100k
Wilson - £80k
Theres £450k saved off the current wage bill (on top of his £120k) - get him signed up on a 9.5 year deal!
between them they've managed 853 mins this season - not even 10 games between them.
Then the other players starts knocking on doors saying I want something similar.

Not going to happen at City though is it, so we don't have to let it happen here.
I don't think anyone should earn 500k a week to play football anyway but I was just showing we've got room to spare once we get rid of the dead wood to increase wages - give Isak, Tonali, Bruno and Botman an extra 100k each and get that spine tied down and you've got 50k to spare.![]()
The difficulty will be in offloading them. Aside from Wilson, whose contract expires in June.Kelly - £150k
Trippier - £120k
Targett - £100k
Wilson - £80k
Theres £450k saved off the current wage bill (on top of his £120k) - get him signed up on a 9.5 year deal!
between them they've managed 853 mins this season - not even 10 games between them.
At City the players are probably all already on wages far higher than our highest... most of their key players for sure... just a guess tbh. They're getting more money and almost guaranteed success.
It is impossible for Newcastle to match the wages of the clubs making much higher revenues and the new psr rules surrounding squad cost ratios will make that even worse.
The difficulty will be in offloading them. Aside from Wilson, whose contract expires in June.
Tripps & Targett both have another year and I can't see too many offers coming in for them.
Kelly has another 5 years. Hopefully Jose bids a bit more for him and we accept.
You then have the squad is too small argument and not being able to rotate players issue.Not going to happen at City though is it, so we don't have to let it happen here.
I don't think anyone should earn 500k a week to play football anyway but I was just showing we've got room to spare once we get rid of the dead wood to increase wages - give Isak, Tonali, Bruno and Botman an extra 100k each and get that spine tied down and you've got 50k to spare.![]()