Off Topic Is the UK right to get

Saxton said not to worry about it - Rajoy's mob are conservative so, as long as he could express it in English, he would most definitely take the sensible view point on all of this.

 

I seem to remember before the invasion of Iraq the UN sent weapons inspectors in to see if Saddam had any .

Then we started bombing.

To my knowledge there was no effort to look for any proof we just started bombing anyway this time.

Seems a bit hasty as we have learned from past mistakes that the Intel may have been wrong or possibly "sexed up" as Iraq didnt have any WMDs and the entire war was based on bullshit.

 

apparantly they didn't have anymore anyway as we made them destroy them all before (at least that's what we've been told)

 

I just read it and it changes nothing to the Calais scenario.

It basically claims that some refugees don't know where their final destination will be as they pay human traffickers and they are not really as reliable as Thomas Cook .


This is your golden nugget that wins the argument ?

The people in Calais know where they are and instead of claiming asylum there they want to come to the UK.

Proving without doubt that they are not refugees as defined in the Dublin agreement.

 

There's no Germans left in Germany they all ****ed off when the 'Syrians' tipped up. Syrians vetoed bombing their own country.

 

It means they blew up a place that houses lots of chemicals. Basically they MOAB'd B&M Bargains.

 

I suspect they mostly bombed some warehouses full of toner cartridges, tins of paint, stuff like that

 

Has this all gone away now, or will there be a next time?

 

What, war? I should think there'll be a next time.