You are not alone pal, i am convinced that we only went into the last 3 conflicts to steal oil......... I believe Pearl harbour was an inside job, JFK was killed by the Feds and am not convinced by the official 911 story..... Its one thing disbelieving the Western biased media but if you try to ram it down peoples throats you come off as patronising mate
Mick posted something about too much porn on here, he said that gaping arseholes were not acceptable................. Yet Toby is still here
So then we are to assume that a nation with no history of military aggression is indeed the greater threat as opposed to and on the say so of a nation which has spent its entire existence conducting aggressive operations?
Iranian citizens demonstrated against the regime and they got rounded up and imprisoned, Israeli citizens demonstrated against cost of living and after a few weeks had their tents confiscated.........
A Nuclear-Armed Iran. The principal sponsor of Hamas and Hezbollah, Iran is inextricably linked to the terrorist threat. But when the Islamic Republic achieves nuclear weapons-capability—as early as this year, according to Israeli intelligence estimates—the threat will amplify manifold. A nuclear-armed Iran creates not one but several existential threats. The most manifest emanates from Iran’s routinely declared desire to “wipe Israel off the map,” and from the fact that cold war calculi of nuclear deterrence through mutually assured destruction may not apply to Islamist radicals eager for martyrdom. Some Israeli experts predict that the Iranian leadership would be willing to sacrifice 50 percent of their countrymen in order to eradicate Israel. Beyond the perils of an Iranian first-strike attack against Israel, the possibility exists that Iran will transfer its nuclear capabilities to terrorist groups, which will then unleash them on Israel via the country’s porous ports and border crossings. A nuclear Iran will also deny Israel the ability to respond to terrorist attacks: in response to an Israeli retaliation against Hezbollah, for example, Iran would go on nuclear alert, causing widespread panic in Israel and the collapse of its economy. Finally, and most menacing, many Middle Eastern states have declared their intention to develop nuclear capabilities of their own once Iran acquires the bomb.
I suppose burying Palestinian children alive by bulldozing houses while they are still in them is acceptable? Why does everyone bring it down this road. I am not comparing both nations deplorable human rights records, I am trying to highlight the strange notions we are fed with regards to the dangers both natons present to the world.
