Interesting thread, Taken from CI

[Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC]

Or indeed a small group of dishonest people representing their own vested interests. #cxxtflask 'til I die.

When it comes to dishonesty, CTWD can't hope to compete with Assem Allam al-liar.

 

[Happy Tiger]

When it comes to dishonesty, CTWD can't hope to compete with Assem Allam al-liar.

They've given it a good go, but honestly Stanners, they can't even lob a frigging webpage up.

 

[Fez]

To say you've got the wrong end of the stick is an understatement. He was referring to the thread that was being discussed before you and HH dragged it into the gutter.

WTF are you on about, Tuckin? Bellend brings it into the gutter does it; on here? I was referring to the thread being discussed and Happy Tigers habitual trend of bringing every club issue to be a CTWD issue. I see no difference in the way HH posts and Happy Tiger posts, as they both attribute everything to CTWD with qualifying their opinion; hence why I lump them both together. HH was posting like a Bellend, simple really and Happy Tiger jumps on anything and everything to push his position - facts only get in the way.
The fact that we have a Bellend making comments he cannot substantiate on here and folk are quoting a thread on another board that is doing the same does not make anything more correct, truthful or correct. At the time of the furore over seating CTWD had declared they had no line of communication with the club, so to demand they should have provided such a line was both futile and rather ridiculous; to be still overegging the whole thing in a gratuitous backslapping exercise is pathetic.

 

[Fez]

They've given it a good go, but honestly Stanners, they can't even lob a frigging webpage up.

Classic Happy Tiger; he loves the way you give his nonsense credit.

 

[Tuckin]

WTF are you on about, Tuckin? Bellend brings it into the gutter does it; on here? I was referring to the thread being discussed and Happy Tigers habitual trend of bringing every club issue to be a CTWD issue. I see no difference in the way HH posts and Happy Tiger posts, as they both attribute everything to CTWD with qualifying their opinion; hence why I lump them both together. HH was posting like a Bellend, simple really and Happy Tiger jumps on anything and everything to push his position - facts only get in the way.
The fact that we have a Bellend making comments he cannot substantiate on here and folk are quoting a thread on another board that is doing the same does not make anything more correct, truthful or correct. At the time of the furore over seating CTWD had declared they had no line of communication with the club, so to demand they should have provided such a line was both futile and rather ridiculous; to be still overegging the whole thing in a gratuitous backslapping exercise is pathetic.

What I'm on about is you completely misunderstanding Happy's post on page 1.

Here it is below. It's as clear as day that when he says "Funny thread" he's talking about the one on CI, not this one - hence the comment on Dutch.

Funny thread. Causes me to be begrudgingly admiring of Dutch. He's right about how they treat anyone questioning them.

I'm surprised given recent hints in membership surges to see its still 1800ish.

Hardly representing the fans are they? It's still a minority headed up by someone who thinks our owner is a ****.

No comment there about anything connected to your niggles with HH.

Now here's your reply to him. For some reason you start banging on about your spat with HH, which Happy hadn't referred to at all.

What you on about? He's a bellend because he's a bellend. Why do you presume every thread is a CTWD thread?

For once in his life, Happy was actually getting a thread back on track, rather than derailing it (which you and HH had done with your spat). There are many, many occasions when he's guilty of bringing CTWD into threads where it doesn't belong - but this thread (and the linked CI one) was about CTWD.

 

[Fez]

What I'm on about is you completely misunderstanding Happy's post on page 1.

Here it is below. It's as clear as day that when he says "Funny thread" he's talking about the one on CI, not this one - hence the comment on Dutch.



No comment there about anything connected to your niggles with HH.

Now here's your reply to him. For some reason you start banging on about your spat with HH, which Happy hadn't referred to at all.



For once in his life, Happy was actually getting a thread back on track, rather than derailing it (which you and HH had done with your spat). There are many, many occasions when he's guilty of bringing CTWD into threads where it doesn't belong - but this thread (and the linked CI one) was about CTWD.

Yes, I see your point and apologise for not reading it properly, I'm guilty of being tired and scanning on a device I'm not yet familiar with.

No spat with HH, as he is a Bellend, just as his current activity shows.

I am away working and have had a quick look at the board and it is full of similar ****e; pointless argument with no substance.

In my exasperation with the whole pointless argument that HT (and others) promote, I lumped dross together. I apologise for that, it won't happen again, as I will ensure I will address all dross specifically. Thanks for keeping me on track, please feel free to do the same for the errant communications conversations.

 

[Happy Tiger]

I actually didn't realise you were having a go at me anyhow Fez, I just assumed it was HH you were going for.

I still forgive you though.

 

[Fez]

I actually didn't realise you were having a go at me anyhow Fez, I just assumed it was HH you were going for.

I still forgive you though.

You keep enjoying yourself. To be fair, you do seem to be winning the odd point, but I put that down to piss poor opposition and the odd mental aberration, such as mine. BlackBerry PlayBooks are a tool of the devil.

Please don't start the smooching thing; its a Filey thing, he does it with panache; get off his toes!