It wasn't me ---- but it could just as easily have been ( or anyone of the other STH.)
I have sympathies for both Mr. Scally and for the fan in question. I don't doubt, for one minute, that trying to maintain the financial integrity of GFC is an extremely difficult task. I understand that Mr. Scally has 'more important' matters to attend - than to be preoccupied with correspondence from a single fan - and that the 'value' in the matter in question, was not time-efficient for 'immediate' attention --- but -- that is no excuse for ignoring repeated correspondence.
I have a 2 year season ticket - which I know is
technically not giving me optimum value for money ( compared with the lower ifollow cost for games. ) I accept that circumstances are 'exceptional,' and I personally will not seek any refund for missed games of last season. I am sure that I am not alone with this mindset.
From the available information in the case in hand, I suspect that the fan in question, did not seek a refund - but wished for a clear explanation of the Club's policy on the matter.
It is obvious that the matter only escalated when Mr. Scally / the Club
seemingly ignored various forms of communication. -
That is unprofessional and arrogant. Such discourtesy will always antagonise people. .........Perhaps if Mr. Scally had 'come out' and asked if fans could waive any claim for a refund, this mess could have been avoided. Mr. Scally could also have said that, if any fan was in particular financial difficulty, he would consider a refund.... This would probably have attracted more compassion for Mr. Scally, and I am sure that most STH would not demand their consumer 'Rights.'
The IFO has not discovered any justifiable reason why the Club should have ignored the fans' request for clarification - until, out of frustration ( at lack of reply to several emails ), the fan has accused Mr. Scally of treating fans as 'cash cows.' .... Is it a coincidence that at this very point (all-of-a-sudden ), Mr. Scally gives recognition to the fan.... The IFO has suggested that the Club would have done well to have a better PR exercise ( nothing new there ! ) -- and it's not the first time that the Club has been criticised for its' inability to 'communicate' (( McCammon / Pulis etc )).
The sorry state of affairs is now a PR disaster - attracting more adverse publicity for the Club. Mr. Scally is
the 'professional' in this incident. He is recognised as having ( or should have ), the professional customer relations qualities necessary. The fan is not unlike a 'customer' in other retail establishments. The fan paid for a service / commodity which was not delivered. The fan has, to my mind, been quite patient in waiting for an answer to the restitution question ----- and it has to be remembered that
none of us would part with money
without getting something ! --- Mr. Scally's intention may not be to treat fans as 'cash cows' - but his / the Clubs' lack of dialogue can easily make it an understandable accusation.....