1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

****ing FA shortsighted pricks

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by Bodinki, Mar 23, 2015.

  1. StanDMan

    StanDMan Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    646
    He would have never had the chance but for his half decent elder sibling.
     
    #21
  2. george the blue

    george the blue Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2012
    Messages:
    772
    Likes Received:
    207
    I'll be honest, Id go further than the FA have and require that 5/11 players must be club trained or english.

    there are so many average players from abroad in our leagues, and for every ronaldo that comes-there are 5 potential harry kanes who need the right chance, at the right time to kick on. The only reason english players dont do so well is that they generally don't get the chances at the top level.

    what the FA are doing will lower the price of english players, give them more exposure, and improve the national team.

    if that means the CL is out our grasps for 3 years or so, thats great. id rather be an also ran with 11 ryan bertrands than what we have now tbh.
     
    #22
  3. Chelsea Pensioner

    Chelsea Pensioner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,388
    Likes Received:
    1,385
    That's very valid critique, gifted inexperienced players improve when they play with top class players. However to start the process of improving overall standards on a false premise that banning "ordinary" foreign players, who no Club would knowingly sign anyway, and replacing them with "ordinary" British players, should be the starting point.Some kind of compulsory number of home grown youngsters playing in every team during the season is surely a better start.
     
    #23
  4. Diego

    Diego Lone Ranger

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    47,770
    Likes Received:
    23,834
    Instead of all this "home grown imports" ****, perhaps we should ban imports under the age of 21. That way you would only be buying a talent to go straight into your squad and the "home grown" players would have a chance to develop and prove themselves.
     
    #24
  5. DferPolarBear

    DferPolarBear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    115
    I kinda get the feeling it is trying too hard. It must be the Polar Bear (we ignore International boarders) in me, but I don't feel the need to farm children to create the next master race. I'm more behind aspirations than an out dated sense of National pride. Competition on a global scale will ultimately always be a numbers game. Invest in Chinese grass roots football (or anything) and they'll win everything, but it wouldn't mean then that the Chinese were intrinsically the World's greatest players. We already see this at work in the Olympics. The only reason the England and Wales cricket team still have a chance at the World cup is because other countries tend not to give a monkey's about cricket because if the Chinese took it up......
     
    #25
  6. Bristol Blue

    Bristol Blue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    335
    Indeed, in England, grass roots training on often expensive pitches in expensive football gear and football boots counts for nothing. The England Cup winners of 1966 would have learned their skills kicking a ball against a wall in a street and with jumpers for goal posts when in a park. The Brazillians in the current Chelsea side probably learned their skills in a back street or barefoot and on a beach as children.
     
    #26

Share This Page