Committing murder and killing a tyrant are two different things though. I believe I could and would kill to protect my family, but could not commit cold blooded murder for money..
I wouldn't spend half of it on any alcohol, women or gambling and I wouldn't waste the other £500,000 either
No, but you didn't say that. Yeah I was trying to be funny, just like you have all week with certain posters.
I'd drink that ball sweat right up for a million. I reckon I could set aside ten grand for therapy and a few quid for mouthwash.
What did I say? So having a different opinion to some people on here means I'm trying to be funny? Sure.
You keep jumping on different threads getting all bitchy, warning posters not to say certain things. Basically being pedantic. Just ignore me, you are one poster that I can't ****ing stand. I've never liked you, you know **** all about football, **** all about ****ing women and **** all about life in general. ****ing fat bastard get a burger down ya.
Murder is murder. Deciding who's a tyrant can depend on your point of view. Most people would kill to protect their family RAW. But killing in cold blood for a million..... not something to be rejected out of hand.
While meanwhile their dad is in prison and they have to live with the stigma of being the offspring of a murderer..
While sipping pins colada's by the pool somewhere hot and no extradition treaties to worry about. I'm sure I'd just be a distant memory
As I say, I believe that I could kill to protect my family from harm and be able to live with myself for doing so. I'm not sure I could live with myself if I killed an innocent victim just for money.
I once read a book called the Iceman. It was about a Polish Jew called Richard Kucklinski. Fascinating. He became a contract hit man for the mafia. He was paid to take people out & he did it very efficiently. Never gave a thought to the people on the list or their families. He just saw it as a job.
