I'm sorry, but why would someone against the name change and a member of the CTWD group be representing BOTH those for and against it? He's part of an anti-name change campaign, he's representing those AGAINST it. Is it that hard to understand? I think more people were for him being our representative than against as well....
I am here to support this fish, it should be respected as the elder statesman on here, as it is over 150 years old. Maybe would have had more sense that AA come to thing about it.
He was representing those against the name change, what don't you get? If it annoys you that much, get a group of pro-name change people together to meet Allam and then you can choose a representative. Oh wait, you won't though, will you?
Think you might struggle on the proof side. The crucial e-mail was never made public. Apparently it was sent to various contacts the club knew of requesting they forward an invitation to the representative of each forum to attend the meeting with Allam. It seems OLM conveniently construed this as a personal invitation for himself to attend the meeting as our representative. The rest as they say is history http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/234492-Meeting-with-Dr-Allam/page11
Don't need to. Assem is already representing me, and we all know who is going to win this, don't we? So, I'm not annoyed, I'm enjoying you frothing at the mouth about it. All over by Christmas do you think? Hope you haven't asked Santa for a season ticket for next year!
More like you wouldn't be able to find as many people for this name change as against it... Nobody knows who is going to win this. He may think he has won, but he hasn't. A long time yet before any victor can be seen.
