It's not that they are too stupid to put on condoms - it's that if they just listened to the Catholic church and stopped ****ing each other then there would be no STDs.
There was also the 'not understanding how condoms work' argument. Rebel has solved the global AIDS crisis
And you have solved the global "****wits who are too thick to follow a very simple argument so instead invent a vague approximation of what somebody else says" shortage. Between you, Med Dog, StereoTobist and Willis we are stockpiling *****s incapable of basic comprehension. I am quite happy to revisit the argument to try and get it through your pig ignorant skull if you like?
You could do that, but I think most people on here would prefer you to cut your cock off so you can do your bit to save the world from hiv you aids ridden spastic.
Wouldn't it be ironic if in saving my life from the horrific cock cutting injury the doctors gave me a blood transfusion from your mother and I got the AIDS anyway.
If you were half as smart as you think you are you would be talked of in the same breath as Einstein, Vivekananda, Bohr etc. If you were twice as smart as you actually are you would still be one of the biggest, simple-minded imbeciles on here
I don't think I'm smart. I know that just like Toby, Willis and Med Dog you have demonstrated that you have little interest in comprehending the points that others make, instead you chose to project arguments of your own invention. It is a skill you can work on. It doesn't make you a bad person.
Rebel's guide to arguing: - Make a statement - Everyone points out that statement is wrong - Deny that you made said statement There's a reason why so many others disagree with you on many issues Rebel. It's because you're wrong
If I am wrong, I have no trouble whatsoever conceding a point. If I am unclear at times then of course I have no problem in offering an apology for being inarticulate. I can work on that too. What I do not do (except by way of illustrating a point) is to randomly make **** up. That is your problem. You'll have to give me an example of a time I have made a statement that is untrue that I have steadfastly stuck to.
I hate to add to the collective let's have a go at Rebel fest on here but I have tio say I find this statement extarordinary. Getting a retraction from you is like getting a sensible post out of medro or Mind the step - or, put another way, about as common as rocking horse ****e. You're not the only one though
I asked a question where have I ever steadfastly stuck to a point where I am demonstrably wrong. That is all. If I am wrong on any point and people feel like they want me to concede it, then raise it and I will.
There is no flaw in the logic that if people stop ****ing each other they will stop sexually transmitted disease. The flaw is in the expectation that human mammals will stop ****ing each other.
AIDS was created in the lab .... [video=youtube;Tjrzo_eLfZM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjrzo_eLfZM[/video]
Yes Mick, the first part of that argument is irrefutable. The second part relates to the understanding of what the church is asking. It is not to have no sex, but to have sex within a committed monogomous relationship. The argument then becomes subjective as to what the natural state for humanity is. Is it to procreate with as many partners as possible or is it to conform to societal expectations of thd idea of "family". That argument is removed from the one that says thr Catholic Church is responsible for the spread of AIDS. That position is untenable as it presupposes that people listen to the church. If they did, then they wouldn't be having sex with multiple partners as a matter of course. If the argument is about the Church structures in sub saharan Africa as being like a turf war precluding people promoting the use of condoms then that is a different argument again, which in all this time having the debate nobody has wished to enter into. There may be a case there, I wouldn't mind exploring it. That is where the argument lies and not in any of the things any of us have said to date. Including the position invented on my behalf.
