Not that i think he's going to fail but i would hardly count scoring in friendlies a counter to flop... even kezman scored in like every friendly for us and we all know how that turned out
I think you're missing the point of my post
Not that i think he's going to fail but i would hardly count scoring in friendlies a counter to flop... even kezman scored in like every friendly for us and we all know how that turned out
Not that i think he's going to fail but i would hardly count scoring in friendlies a counter to flop... even kezman scored in like every friendly for us and we all know how that turned out
You have a point ... but I can top it ... Ahmed Musa scored a brace for us against Barcelona in that pre-season Champions tournament 12 months ago... we all got very excited 
I think you're missing the point of my post![]()
You have a point ... but I can top it ... Ahmed Musa scored a brace for us against Barcelona in that pre-season Champions tournament 12 months ago... we all got very excited
![]()

Yes you did...You have a point ... but I can top it ... Ahmed Musa scored a brace for us against Barcelona in that pre-season Champions tournament 12 months ago... we all got very excited
![]()
He is off on a world tour - tickets are in sale at 9.00 tomorrow on Harvesters
Well, it's been a decent run on this board for me. I have had some good times.
It's not that this board is now going to be moderated that has given me cause to be believe that the fun is over, it's the manner in which it is, inevitably, going to be moderated.
Rather than confine the banter to one thread and let everyone walk a tightrope with every other thread, what should happen is that any thread should be off limits unless it is declared, by the creator of that thread to be open to banter.
That way, those sensitive posters who don't like the usual banter will be able to choose to stick to only those threads that have not declared a free-for-all. Better still, they will be able to create their own threads as "safe zones" in the comfort of knowing that anyone posting anything remotely like banter on them will be hit with a ban.
That would be the sensible and fairest way of dealing with these threads.
It would mean - also - that someone like me, who enjoys a lot of banter, could nonetheless choose to post a thread that is declared safe from the usual ****wittedness.
The way things have now been set up by brb, however, will mean that I am inevitably banned, since anything I write outside the one-and-only "wum thread" is going to be seen as provocation - regardless of the fact that it will only be same old ****wits who pile onto my comments claiming provocation. You folks know how this is going to go down, and I'm not going to hang around to watch it happen.
Therefore, rather than put myself through the circus, I am going to leave town.
I will post, every now and then, on the Spurs board - as I always do.
Cheers, folks. It's been nice crossing swords with you.
Is this an annual occurrence, do we know if he made a thread in 2018?![]()

We've accounted for two of Kipper's flounce of threads, but there is at least one more and possibly a 4th.
Fook it, i'm title changing them, find one for 2018
The title amendmentWe've accounted for two of Kipper's flounce of threads, but there is at least one more and possibly a 4th.
The title amendment
