nothing wrong with varying between different ones. It's that constant and him and ****head use. tossers.
I thought you were calling me a bellend last week when I called you a ****er Next time you say King ****head you need to be more specific
going by what supporters of other clubs always say, i always believed the difference between us and the rest of the league was howard webb???
Nah, he runs around like a headless chicken and hasn`t scored a goal all season. Being played out of position and in a different coloured kit is no excuse
This is a good United team who are gelling at the moment, this team can dominate the league for the next 10 years.
Maybe the truth is that you haven't been forced to extend yourselves to any great extent this year. A few times like at Southampton when you looked like you'd lose you came out and showed why you are a formidabble team. But there are many more games where you haven't needed to be great to win. The performances in Europe last two years, and the defeast to Barca in the recent finals have been a truer measure of your standard. Your defense has been shakey this season, but there haven't been enough teams in teh league with attacks that could capitalise on your failings. The league this season has been poor, but credit to you for dealing with it, and I wish Arsenal had such an "average" team/squad as you have had.
We were defensively poor until about January and we tightened things up. De Gea was 17 minutes away from breaking Schmeichels longest streak without conceding a goal in the league., until City scored Monday night. Other than the multiple comebacks we've had this season, we've been efficient at best. We do just enough to win, and nothing more.
sure not .. we have many great quality at this side, i think we just missed a player a la "Silva" or "Mata" style to inject some creativity ..I think the team lacked some flair too .. bit otherwise a very solid side
Agree that this Utd team isnt streets ahead of us or City to be honest. Examples of those teams is the Chelsea team of 2005, Arsenal's Invincibles in 2004 and the Utd team of 2001, all three teams teams anhilated all comers in the league in those years. The difference between United and City and Chelsea is that Utd have RVP, and a manager who is the master at building and utilising a squad to perfection over 38 games. City are still a relatively new side and our squad has no balance, no real manager and no mastermind behind it, its the bastardisation and cross over between 3 managers work (Jose, Carlo and AVB) all sewn together.
I think that Chelsea team was great meanwhile i think the Arsenal invincible side would had struggled to be as successful now with the same squad, PL has developed and improved alot since
