I am saying it!!!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I don't believe we were in a crisis. A crisis is being in Portsmouth's position, or Darlington's position.

And before you try and tell us that Wenger said we were in a crisis, he didn't. He said we went through a mini crisis and his latest words on it were that it was a couple of blips.
 
I said we had issues to, I'm not disagreeing with that - I also said that the solutions were within the club, which has proved to be right.

Sacking the manager, selling Walcott and Sagna was not the answer to our problems as you were advocating.

So, I'll ask you again about GG, do you think he's right to say that we should 'Let Walcott go' ?

We certainly did have issues - we were in crisis (unless GG is talking **** on that too).

Of course you were arguing that the only change made is confidence - so I guess we've just lacked confidence for nearly 8 years <laugh> Or was it more than confidence and you were wrong on that too???
 
So looking back, what turned out to be a correct assessment of the situation?

(1) That the solutions were within the club ?

(2) That we should have sacked Wenger and sold Walcott and Sagna ?
 
I don't believe we were in a crisis. A crisis is being in Portsmouth's position, or Darlington's position.

And before you try and tell us that Wenger said we were in a crisis, he didn't. He said we went through a mini crisis and his latest words on it were that it was a couple of blips.

a crisis is not a mini crisis <laugh> Oh and that means you think GG was wrong on that too.

How are all these people wrong except when they say something you agree with????????

VERY STRANGE.
 
So looking back, what turned out to be a correct assessment of the situation?

(1) That the solutions were within the club ?

(2) That we should have sacked Wenger and sold Walcott and Sagna ?

Nice try Piskie trying to boil it down and over simplify it - sorry but I am still laughing at you for thinking you know more than GG and that every player is only worth listening to when they agree with you <laugh>
 
Of course you were arguing that the only change made is confidence - so I guess we've just lacked confidence for nearly 8 years Or was it more than confidence and you were wrong on that too???

I can only presume that you're either stupid or deliberately misrepresent to try and support your incorrect views (maybe both)

If you had actually properly bothered to read what I said , you will have noticed that I said the reason for our turnaround was:

(1) Players returning from injury
(2) Arresting the mistakes that we were making
(3) Being better defensively
(4) Subsequent confidence returning
(5) Reflected in results

But I guess you ignore that, because it shows up your 'Wenger out' and 'Sell Walcott and Sanga' suggestions as being utter crap <ok>
 
Let me boil it down for you :

1) you think that the only change is confidence - despite us not winning the league in 8 years, and no trophy in 7.
2) you think its all fixable within - despite the club offloading a slew of players and bringing in 9 in the summer.
3) most of the things the 'doom mongers' said were also said by ex managers and players - but they were all wrong and dont know what they are talking about either - unless they agree with you.

that about sums it up.

i.e. you talk **** and are a hypocrite.
 
Nice try Piskie trying to boil it down and over simplify it - sorry but I am still laughing at you for thinking you know more than GG and that every player is only worth listening to when they agree with you

Laugh all you want - you still called it wrong <ok>
 
read it again Jayram <doh>

I can only presume that you're either stupid or deliberately misrepresent to try and support your incorrect views (maybe both)

If you had actually properly bothered to read what I said , you will have noticed that I said the reason for our turnaround was:

(1) Players returning from injury
(2) Arresting the mistakes that we were making
(3) Being better defensively
(4) Subsequent confidence returning
(5) Reflected in results

But I guess you ignore that, because it shows up your 'Wenger out' and 'Sell Walcott and Sanga' suggestions as being utter crap
 
So, sacking Wenger and selling Walcott and Sagna was going to be the catalyst for turning around our fortunes <doh>

And you wonder why I pull you up for talking **** Jayram ? <laugh>
 
Piskie (aka 'I know more than George Graham')

Given you think that, then all your other posts must be taken as complete garbage.

Where did I say that I know more than GG ? I said that he (like you) was wrong to say that we should 'let walcott go'

Bullshit seems to be your currency <laugh>
 
Where did I say that I know more than GG ? I said that he (like you) was wrong to say that we should 'let walcott go'

Bullshit seems to be your currency <laugh>

No you didnt.You took a point out of his comments and then labelled him overall for not knowing what he is talking about <ok> Big difference that you cant shake off even with your squirming. The only way off that one is to admit you were talking ****.

Given that you have also told me I was talking **** for saying we were in crisis - which Graham agrees with - I assume you think he was talking **** there too.

Seems he was talking complete **** then according to you - but of course anyone who says something you agree with is held up as proof you are right <laugh>

Hope you see how ridiculous that looks for you.
 
In the main, we made defensive mistakes, which caused our confidence to drain away and we lost and drew games that we should have won.

We addressed the mistakes, we had players return from injury, the confidence returned ahind it's reflected in the results.

This is why we were never that far off (as Henry and Keown said) and why the solutions were always within our club. It was never about sacking the manager and selling our best players. That was simply a ludicrous knee jerk suggestion.
 
No you didnt.You took a point out of his comments and then labelled him overall for not knowing what he is talking about

Again, you talk ****.

I said that on the particular point about 'let Walcott go' he was wrong.

The rest is simply bullshit on your behalf.

Jayram - proven to talk bullshit <ok>
 
In the main, we made defensive mistakes, which caused our confidence to drain away and we lost and drew games that we should have won.

We addressed the mistakes, we had players return from injury, the confidence returned ahind it's reflected in the results.

This is why we were never that far off (as Henry and Keown said) and why the solutions were always within our club. It was never about sacking the manager and selling our best players. That was simply a ludicrous knee jerk suggestion.

Mistakes alone have meant we havent won the title for 7 years <doh> or maybe its Bolton's goal post?

And of course now that we're not far off ........ 4th...... everything is rosy <doh>
 
Again, you talk ****.

I said that on the particular point about 'let Walcott go' he was wrong.

The rest is simply bull**** on your behalf.

Jayram - proven to talk bull**** <ok>

wriggle wriggle wriggle

Are you saying he was right then that we were in crisis?

You cant take it back now - you said GG doesn't know what he is taking about.
 
Again, you talk ****.

I said that on the particular point about 'let Walcott go' he was wrong.

The rest is simply bull**** on your behalf.

Jayram - proven to talk bull**** <ok>

Note your actual quote on GG:

I think that pretty much sums up that he (and you) don't know what you're talking about

I think the words 'pretty much sums up' give you away Piskie.

Most foolish quote I have ever seen on this forum.

You should take it back and least go away with your tail between your legs.
 
No, you completely miss the point. It does not matter if it is on one point or every point. You opened the can that people "in the know" knew better than us, and now you claim you know better than one of them. You cannot have iot all ways. Either EVERYTHING they say is right, or we can all have an equal opinion to them on every subject.

Exactly right - as I have always said - a complete hypocrite.