It does of sorts, except for say having children. However, I would argue that Caitlyn has often engaged in sexual activity, and that the term became one of convenience. Married three times and six kids (I think). What I dispute though is the non gender identity part of the debate, when Caitlyn actually goes and trans to feminine. To me that is identification in itself. Not that I have a problem with that but just Jenner's personal confusing messages behind it. To me it's like saying to be accepted he had to change and conform to the very rules Jenner is against. I just feel that because of the LBGT acceptance (shielded - must not be challenged), that it shouldn't be questioned and if you preach something, then you should also be prepared to be challenged on those thoughts, if those thoughts could be misleading to others who might take their lead example of self identification. Very painful and expensive extremes. Just a view I hold, sorry mate.
You haven't offended anyone mate, if anything it would be me doing the offending, not that that is my intention.
