Huw jenkins proved right in sacking laudrup

Phil, no need for any sarcastic comments towards roof.
Roof rather than respond to them give me a few minutes to see the posts and decal with them.

 

Especially true in your case

 

One word , INJURIES . Meanwhile , what all did dai and phil get right way back. Dai and phil are just as wrong Jenkins on this one . Imo. Like I say , this has nothing to do with Monk . Monk was thrown into this by an amateurish Premier League board and chairman .

 

Measured response sir! but at least I'm not responding in kind..............

 

Why are the board under constant fire. Without this board we wouldn't have a ****ing club

 

Yes so amateurish, that it is they that got us here in the Premier league??...................

 

Thats what makes this sacking so hard to figure , they ****ing blew it Imo ,.

 

Time will tell roof, time will tell.

 

The verb is correct = blow .... but maybe the context should be .......... they blew it, because they were not getting blown.

 

Those who can do, those who can't teach!

 

This is all way to far over your head phil , best be leaving it to the roofer

 

That's more like it Breezy, good to see you have a head for heights.................

 

What's that got to do with anything, Dragon? Of late you've been wholeheartedly supporting the views of a sacked (so I'm led to believe) toilet cleaner.

As for the teaching profession, with no disrespect whatsoever to Valley, standards in the past few years have dropped to an appalling level. Just as I refuse to accept that coppers are the staunch guardians of justice, being a teacher does not imply intellectual excellence. As I remember, didn't a taxi driver win Mastermind many years ago?

Respect a man for what he is, not what he does.

 

The 'sacked toilet cleaner' has been making more sense on here of late than all those crying over Laudrup's dismissal, clearly you need to practise what you preach, didn't a toilet cleaner win mastermind some years back?

 

Flush !

 

I do practise what I preach. If I have something to say to someone I say so. I never attack anyone without a great deal of thought and provocation in equal measure. Neither do I post snide, derisory remarks just because someone else has a different point of view, which seems to be a popular occupation on this board. I will debate and argue my corner and agree to disagree, without rancour or grudge, if it comes to that.

I have 'attacked' just one poster on this board with very good reason and clearly stated my reasons why. Others seemed to agree with what I posted. If people can't post without personal insults, condescending remarks and idiotic smileys just because another poster holds a different pov, it speaks volumes.

Forums are for debate, an exchange of thoughts and opinions, they should not be a medium for indulging in behaviour that belongs in the school ground.

 

Hear Hear Ivor.

 

This board has gone OTT ever since Laudrup's sacking, it would be ever so pleasant when everyone has finally moved on? A new dawn and new challenges to be enjoyed in this Garry Monk chapter.

 

I'm moving forward , if " The Ungratefuls " can let up on our fantastic former manager I'd let it go competely.Beware of the man who wants to move past discrepancies . I' ll always look back and see a ruined opportunity though imo , always . So you Laudrup haters , move on and so will his defendersI guess , let it go

 

You just like to stir the embers, 'Laudrup haters' really? not read any of that on here, not even from Dai