Wow, I've never seen a post like that before. That's right, I have, several times every day zzzzzzzzzz
Such beel for so early in the day. THFC was stating that the changing of names had happened before and was possibly suggesting the changing of the name of Hull City was not that big a deal considering that. Ciarans question was more rhetorical as a statement pointing out that the examples given were very historical and so their relevance to the case of Hull was very limited. Wimbledon did indeed change their name but the fall out would suggest it was a big deal. In conclusion, THFC tries to play down significance of changing the name citing very old examples, Ciaran questions the relevance or applicability of the examples to this case, you explode like a ***** and put across a point that actually affirms that this is probably a big deal. The end. Uneducated cockney ****wit. See what I did there
Why would we care about other clubs? Especially London or Welsh ones lol. No, of course, like everyone else, we took the piss. However, "we're" doing this for EVERYONE so it's EXPECTED you support us. NB: I support our glorious benefactor and am happy for the name change, the "we" here refers to our noisy 5%
