1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Hughton's preferred set up.

Discussion in 'Norwich City' started by Walsh.i.am, Aug 30, 2012.

  1. K E M P

    K E M P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,291
    Likes Received:
    788
    So are you thinking 4-4-2 then?

    I wonder how adaptable the formation will be, I remember Lambert swapping things around almost every week. Hughton comes accross as more of a settled and thoughfull manager. We seemed to have different setups depending on the oposition last season which made us hard to figure out.

    We are turning into a side which has specialist players playing in their preferred position which last season we didn't this should mean we do better, but who knows.
     
    #21
  2. Superman wears Grant Holt pyjamas in bed

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    13,639
    Likes Received:
    346
    4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 probably, depending on opposition. 4-2-3-1 seems the favoured line up so 4-1-3-2 is also possible. many say that too much is read into formations - this is not true. if a manager gets his formation wrong it can lead to a thumping and its far more important than some 'experts' have you believe, but its also important, as you say, to be flexible and adapt during games. many of the players have experience of playing differently under lambert so i doubt there'd be too many issues. i just want to see a slightly more settled back four this year. he can rotate the forward thinking players more but i think its important to have continuity at the back
     
    #22
  3. goldeneadie

    goldeneadie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    6,331
    Likes Received:
    1,301
    and the prize for understatement of the year goes to..........( johnson part)
     
    #23
  4. redruthyella

    redruthyella Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,459
    Likes Received:
    7
    I thought Johnson had a decent game against QPR who admittedly had a poor midfield. He does hit some wayward passes I must admit but Pilks was very guilty of that last week as well.
    In a 5 man middle (I prefer two up front) I haven't seen Tettey play of course but have to assume he will start when fit. And I see Howson and Snodgrass as starters so that leaves two places in my reckoning. One will be a left sided player so at the moment its Pilks over Surman. Leaving one spot. Perm what you prefer from that.
     
    #24
  5. Superman wears Grant Holt pyjamas in bed

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    13,639
    Likes Received:
    346
  6. redruthyella

    redruthyella Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,459
    Likes Received:
    7
    You would have to assume he would be the choice when fit. He can pass but can't tackle (our Scholes?) so does need protecting. Lets hope Tettey is that man.
     
    #26
  7. NORWICHFANNOTON606

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2012
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd have Fox, Howson and Tettey in the middle. They can interchange as Tettey can play further up the pitch with good effect I.e swap with Howson.

    If then play Snodgrass on the right with Hoolahoop or Pilks on the left, with plenty of interchanging options to make defending against us difficult.

    Just not convinced we have a lone striker...

    I like the look of Holt and Jackson...4-4-2 at home is certainly sensible.
     
    #27
  8. bedfordcanary

    bedfordcanary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,000
    Likes Received:
    215
    Reckon the side would look like this then:

    Ruddy

    Martin barnett bassong garrido

    Fox Johnson/tettey

    Snoddy Howson Pilks

    Holt

    Not bad but id feel for Johnson if he were dropped after he had such a good game v QPR
     
    #28

Share This Page