How many more times guys?
- Thread starter Ffsdon'tpassittohim
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Neither can I
I saw what you posted about Caulker and there was bugger all wrong with it
WELL BUGGER ME
My first time on today and yet another thread about poor me
Lets put this to bed for god sake and realize that i will always say or respond to comments as i view things and its no use crying over it as they are my views just as others have their views, some fans agree and some dont and thats the beauty of living in a free country. Those who don't like it and think that only their views are valid are nothing more than controllers and i feel sorry for those who has to live with them as it cant be nice to have a dictator in the family that thinks his/her view is the only view that matters....they need to have a hard look into a mirror and check they dont have horns growing out of their head....Im not one that uses the ignore button much or hardly ever infact but as been said instead of moaning and crying because you don't like to hear different views to yourself then as been said use the bloody ignore button as its not a problem and no skin off anyone's nose, you wont change my personal views and will always post as i see it ..good or bad...So lads/lasses dont use me as an excuse for your idea of stirring things and causing friction between fellow jacks....remember we all want the same thing for the swans to be successful at the end of the day..
My first time on today and yet another thread about poor me
Lets put this to bed for god sake and realize that i will always say or respond to comments as i view things and its no use crying over it as they are my views just as others have their views, some fans agree and some dont and thats the beauty of living in a free country. Those who don't like it and think that only their views are valid are nothing more than controllers and i feel sorry for those who has to live with them as it cant be nice to have a dictator in the family that thinks his/her view is the only view that matters....they need to have a hard look into a mirror and check they dont have horns growing out of their head....Im not one that uses the ignore button much or hardly ever infact but as been said instead of moaning and crying because you don't like to hear different views to yourself then as been said use the bloody ignore button as its not a problem and no skin off anyone's nose, you wont change my personal views and will always post as i see it ..good or bad...So lads/lasses dont use me as an excuse for your idea of stirring things and causing friction between fellow jacks....remember we all want the same thing for the swans to be successful at the end of the day..
KJ, I am not going round in circles with you fella, you have been informed in full so go read back the threads and you will see.
Dai - with you all the way even when I disagree with you (ie most of the time Lol.) 
Taff. I think we are speaking a different language. I have requested from you and brb an explanation via PM as to why I was banned and haven't been told be either of you. In fact you both feigned ignorance because it's now obvious you know more than you said in your PM to me.
As I said, it's not because I want to post over there. I really don't. My ban was lifted ages ago but I haven't posted once, as promised. But it would be nice to know why I was banned when as far as I'm cocerned I've not breached any rules.
But you know that don't you?
Look, a mod's job ain't easy. I get that. But it shouldn't be hard to set out why a person has been banned - it's easy really, and common courtesy. Why are you having such trouble with this? If you openly admitted that whoever took that decision got it wrong I would stop asking.
Taff. I think we are speaking a different language. I have requested from you and brb an explanation via PM as to why I was banned and haven't been told be either of you. In fact you both feigned ignorance because it's now obvious you know more than you said in your PM to me.
As I said, it's not because I want to post over there. I really don't. My ban was lifted ages ago but I haven't posted once, as promised. But it would be nice to know why I was banned when as far as I'm cocerned I've not breached any rules.
But you know that don't you?
Look, a mod's job ain't easy. I get that. But it shouldn't be hard to set out why a person has been banned - it's easy really, and common courtesy. Why are you having such trouble with this? If you openly admitted that whoever took that decision got it wrong I would stop asking.
Fish re your post No.75,this was not meant for you,so you have got the wrong end of the stick. I was interacting with Ffs,but since your name does appear in it,I can see why you were confused.
No not wishful thinking, hoping or whatever, I told you I would return and I promise you my undivided attention pal.
Now back to your point where did you write it? As I told you, and again if you read your own bilge, if we don't agree with what you say ,we are not conforming to your view.
QED
Now you say you taught a Literacy class, well do you firstly understand what Literacy actually means ? I'll give you a clue, it's the ability to read and write and to understand words. Their definitions ( Def-i-nish-on ) It means meaning to you.
Now this boast of yours doesn't state what level you supposedly taught at , it can't be very high as you don't basically understand the definition of conformity !
Dreyfus you thieving barstado, where did you get my cards from
You must log in or register to see images
Valley if that was directed at me I'm not taking any crap from a smug patronizing entity like Libby, because he like another I can mention can abuse other posters and then lay the law down ? Who is he to make assumptions about posters ?
Then condescend , patronize and tell posters to do one with impunity, as he joked with another poster ' not on my watch ' !
That response about sums you up vetch, I have no agenda regarding Dai whatsoever, and have defended his right to post on many occasions in the past, and went out on a limb for him many times on the old BBC 606, but I also think, he needs to calm down regards some of his input, he's forever Wumming his own, and my replies are in response, are as many other posters, that you don't like seeing, reacting to him, well that's your problem, not ours, if you don't like the way I respond to Dai, then you can apply your own advice and ignore, simply really mate, give it a go instead of trying to be some pathetic little mother superior, and by the way I have no massive problem with you at all, just that I simply see through your pathetic agenda, get a life will you!................
PS: If I want to argue with Dai, I'll bloody well do so, and you can bugger off!...................
valley now can you see who likes to control things around here..
Nobody is controlling anything Dai, it's an open forum, what bit about that don't you understand, if you want to be antagonistic to your own posters, then fine, no problem, but stop crying to the mods, when someone responds to you Wums!......................
Full apologees ol' fruit don't like being told what I think by some self anointed ..... I'll leave it there .....
1: DPJ: You're right that Dai does seem to go out of his way to wind people up at times but he's always done that and those of us who've been around long enough know it. But as I see it Dai only "cries to the mods" (ie complains) when he's openly abused in breach of the rules. And so he should. Why people can't ignore him if that's what they want to do is beyond me. As I said before, loads of posters clicked on his thread knowing they'd be wound up. So why look?
2: FFS: "...because he like another I can mention can abuse other posters and then lay the law down." You've done your fair share of abusing, mate and I don't see anyone laying the law down. Lib is just suggesting what I have done - that other people's views be respected even if you think they're spouting tosh. Not unreasonable really. You are missing the point. Neither he nor I agree with Dai 99% of the time. Dai knows this - but he's entitled to say what he likes if it doesn't breach the rules. Fact is most repsonses to him do breach them.
Now I suggest we all simmer down. Big game for us tomorrow.
2: FFS: "...because he like another I can mention can abuse other posters and then lay the law down." You've done your fair share of abusing, mate and I don't see anyone laying the law down. Lib is just suggesting what I have done - that other people's views be respected even if you think they're spouting tosh. Not unreasonable really. You are missing the point. Neither he nor I agree with Dai 99% of the time. Dai knows this - but he's entitled to say what he likes if it doesn't breach the rules. Fact is most repsonses to him do breach them.
Now I suggest we all simmer down. Big game for us tomorrow.
1: DPJ: You're right that Dai does seem to go out of his way to wind people up at times but he's always done that and those of us who've been around long enough know it. But as I see it Dai only "cries to the mods" (ie complains) when he's openly abused in breach of the rules. And so he should. Why people can't ignore him if that's what they want to do is beyond me. As I said before, loads of posters clicked on his thread knowing they'd be wound up. So why look?
Now I suggest we all simmer down. Big game for us tomorrow.
Look knackered, it's not about 'looking', before he put that thread up wanting Laudrup out, he had already invaded numerous threads with 'Laudrup doesn't know what he's doing', and '9 out of 42, garbage' then when the Scousers came on here, he saw it as an opportunity to score points over his own, even Ivor was disgusted with him, and he has the bare face to say on this thread, that 'he's not responsible for all the infighting, and then you get Vetch spouting 'ignore him please, and stop persecuting him', please give me a break???....................
KJ if you look at my original post it was for everyone who was getting wound up to use the ignore button. With which you agreed.That was it purely and simply. Then I start getting second guessed on my views of the freedom of speech by someone who doesn't personally know me, then I get a lecture .Post #4 of this thread.
Read it again mate.
Fcuk him, that's my view point. I won't allow him to condescend to me or impose his views or values on me either. If he wants to apologise fair enough if not well that is also down to him.
Read it again mate.
Fcuk him, that's my view point. I won't allow him to condescend to me or impose his views or values on me either. If he wants to apologise fair enough if not well that is also down to him.