How long do we give him ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Pinto is looking a really really strange signing. There was lots of talk that he is an attacking right back that can't defend. If people in the press said that, before he even turned up here, why are we buying him!? What are our scouts doing?! From his debut you could see he is not a defensive player. It's carried on from there, in the same fashion. Why are a team that can't defend, buying a right back who can't defend to save his life?

I thought defensively he was hugely improved on Saturday. By no means perfect, but he looked ok. I don't blame the Swansea goal just on him
 
Pinto and Redmond were both too slow tracking back
for the goal.
No excuse, but it did / does highlight just how much we miss Tettey.
Especially playing with wing backs who love to bomb forward and therefore end up becoming out of position.
But to base solidity around a holding midfielder with dodgy knees and a pretty poor disciplinary record is asking for trouble. :(
 
No excuse, but it did / does highlight just how much we miss Tettey.
Especially playing with wing backs who love to bomb forward and therefore end up becoming out of position.
But to base solidity around a holding midfielder with dodgy knees and a pretty poor disciplinary record is asking for trouble. :(
Where is Bradley Johnson when you need him?<doh>
 
Pinto and Redmond were both too slow tracking back
for the goal.ext
Still think 3 centre backs and 2 wing backs is our
best set up.

Don't worry I'm sure we'll play 3 centre backs again, probably next game then the next game we'll change again and the following game something different. It should be no surprise our players, particularly our defence look so disorganised. It's crazy that we've got to this stage of the season and AN still doesn't know his best formation / team. Whilst I'm all for competition and keeping players on their toes, consistence also has its place.
 
.....and the following game something different.
Agree with this canario <ok>
By this stage of the season it should be 95% about what we do best, not trying (and normally failing) to negate the opposition by setting up based on what they do best. Poor show, really and AN has only got himself to blame for the disjointed performances.
 
Don't worry I'm sure we'll play 3 centre backs again, probably next game then the next game we'll change again and the following game something different. It should be no surprise our players, particularly our defence look so disorganised. It's crazy that we've got to this stage of the season and AN still doesn't know his best formation / team. Whilst I'm all for competition and keeping players on their toes, consistence also has its place.

Exactly what a lot of posters on here have been saying for weeks - I just wish AN would read some of them!!!!
 
Don't worry I'm sure we'll play 3 centre backs again, probably next game then the next game we'll change again and the following game something different. It should be no surprise our players, particularly our defence look so disorganised. It's crazy that we've got to this stage of the season and AN still doesn't know his best formation / team. Whilst I'm all for competition and keeping players on their toes, consistence also has its place.

I guess it's all about perception. AN perceives that his best team is not always going to be the same and is dependant on the oposition. Had he stuck to 3 at the back vs the Swans and we went on to lose without scoring, he might have got a fair wodge of stick for having gone into a game too defensively in a game we really needed a win. I happen to agree with you that it would have been better to try to keep some consistency and gone 3 at the back, lets face it anything less than that against Citeh and we'll get ripped apart, though that is probable even with 3 anyway!

Bah!
 
I guess it's all about perception. AN perceives that his best team is not always going to be the same and is dependant on the oposition. Had he stuck to 3 at the back vs the Swans and we went on to lose without scoring, he might have got a fair wodge of stick for having gone into a game too defensively in a game we really needed a win. I happen to agree with you that it would have been better to try to keep some consistency and gone 3 at the back, lets face it anything less than that against Citeh and we'll get ripped apart, though that is probable even with 3 anyway!

Bah!

I've just caught up with MotD and Pinto and Redmond should hang their heads in shame.
Pinto loses the ball on the edge of the Swansea area, doesn't track back and we're 1-0 down!! <doh>
 
I've just caught up with MotD and Pinto and Redmond should hang their heads in shame.
Pinto loses the ball on the edge of the Swansea area, doesn't track back and we're 1-0 down!!
He was quoted as being "the best right back in the Croatian leagues" when he was poised to join us.
Well, if we do get relegated as many fear, can I suggest we play next season in said Croatian league - to have an almost nailed-on chance of bouncing straight back <ok>
(Plus I absolutely adore the country anyway, so any excuse to spend lots more time there!!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHCanary and JM Fan
If you play wingbacks, 3 centre backs and a defensive midfielder then surely if the wing back loses the ball in the opposition penalty area it is the job of one of the others to cover for him or has Pinto now become the hate figure who has to be blamed for everything?