Very true. People who actually understand statistics (and their significance) know that stats can only be used to support an argument, they never completely determine it. But then given Nani's overall performances and how much more statistically effective he has been, it's hard to argue he should have been left out. P.S. It's not just people on here - you should have seen Mike Summerbee's bitter rant after our 2-1 win against City...
I've seen that video, I thought it was class . The reason I pointed it out though is because I remember Nolhman saying that stats mean nothing when somebody had proved him wrong with stats.
I've also heard them say those specific statistics are inaccurate. Don't worry, you're not the only one who thinks they're insane.
