The races I have seen recently it seems that Ryan Moore is head and shoulders above the rest. I have been watching races totally unbiased as I have stopped gambling. What do the other posters think?

A point I have raised many times on the forum is the weight range currently used in both codes. On the flat you are basically looking at 8st - 10st and in National Hunt 10st - 12st. This means that most jockeys must live in a permanent state of malnourishment and deprivation in order to maintain their weight, and this is certainly not conducive to being alert, fit, mentally flexible and "on top of your game" generally. Would it not be possible to shift these weight ranges up a stone - the flat weights going to 9st - 11st and the NH from 11st - 13st? This would end the suffering of many jockeys and open up the profession to more aspiring youngsters. Yes, race times and performance of the horses would be adversely affected, but it would be a level playing field because everyone would be carrying more weight. Seems like a sensible course of action to me.
I pretty much agree with this although Mccoy steals races he really shouldn't be winning.Over the sticks National Hunt ‘saddle monkeys’ are all the same to me and I’ve always been of the opinion that as long as you’ve got one of the top 50 on board it doesn’t really matter which one is atop your beast.


You can still get 13/8 about Moore for the jockeys title