Nice try at pseudo intellect there HIAG, even though you're wrong. The principle behind Schrödinger's cat is that the cat is both dead and alive UNTIL the box is opened, when the cat is then definitely dead. You see, one scenario juxtaposes against the other, thereby giving the unopened box the quantum paradox of having both equations being of equal likelihood. But it requires the observer to know that the cat will be dead by opening the box, to allow the juxtoposition of an unopened box having both a dead and alive cat within it. The analogy also holds with regard to your comments on here. Observed from the outside they appear to be badly constructed wum attempts that frequently come back to haunt you. But on the inside it is indiscernable whether they are actually ******ed constructs of failed wummery or whether you actually believe the **** that you are about to post. Therefore one can only conclude that they are both failed acts of wummery and utter **** that you actually believe.
You see, PESKIE! I immediately raise the intellectual level whenever I am the conduit for debate. I bet it's been a while since you boys discussed quantum mechanics and quantum field theory over on the Gooners' board, eh! And what I especially like about this debate is that there has been no wumming, on either side.
Oh, dear! You are showing yourself up to be a bit of a plank, here, PESKIE! And I am not referring to Max Planck, unfortunately for you! Again, you have completely missed the point of what Schrödinger was trying to explain. The paradox isn't concerned with direct observation (which is not only impossible in the case of quantum theory and quantum mechanics, but entangles one up in the problems highlighted in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle). But enough of such small talk! I could expand on this subject, and probe further into matters concerning quantum field theory, its many controversies, and the more startling of its predictions, but I fear that it will serve only to drive you back into that closet under your mum's stairs, to furiously beat out your frustrations at your relative lack of intellectual acuity in a frenzy of masturbatory toil.
All of this talk of QFT has led me to devise my own thought-experiment. I have entitled it PESKIE's Mother's Closet. The experiment goes like this. Into the closet that sits under the stairs in the house of PESKIE's mother, we place a naked PESKIE, a copy of Razzle, and a box of man-sized special-strength tissues. The door is closed. We wait two minutes. The question, now, is: has PESKIE finished ****ing or not? Until we open the mother's closet door, QFT demands that there are two naked PESKIEs in the closet: one who is still furiously frotting away at his pork-sword, and another who is already dipping into the box of Kleenex and trying to unglue the pages of the jazz mag. Only by opening the door and making an observation do we "bring into existence" one PESKIE or the other. I might publish this experiment in a scientific paper and put it up for peer-review. One day, PESKIE and his masturbatory antics could be on the tip of the tongue of every student, around the world!
I'm afraid your intellect lacks comprehension of the finer, but crucial points of this theory HIAG. You have missed the vital point of the mechanics, which is that it is only when the observer knows that the cat is dead (by opening the box) that we then enter into the juxtaposition of the cat being both dead and alive when the box is closed. Without the latter, it is just a box. The observer must understand the concept of the open box with the broken vial and dead cat, to understand the duality of the closed box with the either broken or unbroken vial. Let's bring this back into the context of your failed wummery. You said before the City game that due to Agero and Kompany being back in the team, Whinger was ****ed. since we cannot discerne whether that was a failed wum attempt or utter **** that you believe, the observer must conclude that you are a failed wum who also believes the **** you write. Again this theory applies to your comment about Arsenal vying for the '3rd best team in London'. Seeing as Arsenal are currently 2nd ahead of the spuds. The observer must conclude that this is a ******ed construct of doomed wummery, whilst also being a deluded belief based on utter ****. In fact, the scientific mind would now have a consistent measure of your failure and ineptitude to confidently assert that you are a doomed wum who cannot help himself because you actually believe the **** you write. This new concept should be named: Hiagdingers Twat
Even though you have failed to properly grasp the intellectual fineries of this concept HIAG, I will grant you some credit for a valiant effort with your psuedo science. I guess all that time spent alone in the spare room of your mothers house munching on Cheetos and pissing into a bucket allows you some time to investigate the theories behind quantum mechanics.
No, they are different. Unfortunately for HIAG his mother is also his Sister. It's not his fault the family gene pool has been dumbed down in this way, but it does explain a few things ....
The other theory could be that he isn't in the closet ****ing. But you clearly are in the closet with your fixation on Peskie and him ****ing, so be brave and come oit.
This perfectly explains the theory of multiple realities as described by quantum mechanics. The closet and the ****ing actually exists only in HIAG's reality, not mine. His fixation with the ****ing and the closet are a perfect metaphor not only for quantum physics but also for Freudian psychology, where of course Freud would explain that his fixation is due to an inner desire to express his own sexual orientation, or maybe an unresolved Oedipal issue with his mother, complicated further because she is also his sister.
The fact that he has been rinsed, spun and hung out to dry so often has exacerbated that inferiority complex. You have to pity HIAG really. His repressed homosexual desires, mixed with his inferiority complex and penchant for failed wummery have created one mixed up little puppy.
As I said, I could go far deeper into this subject, but I fear that your failure to grasp even the basic principles renders an attempt at such an exercise useless. It's not QM that describes multi-verses, PESKIE, rather it is one of the more controversial and bizarre predictions of super-string theory. And, actually, albeit unwittingly, you do touch on a valid point. Super-string theory (or string theory, as it is more commonly referred to among theoretical physicists) posits the odd scenario that, at the time you are in your mother's closet, PESKIE, across innumerable dimensions, there are a whole load of other PESKIEs in their closet, playing out every possible scenario, from not having a **** (both naked and clothed), to having the best **** you've every had (both naked and clothed). Basically, the theory has you ****ing across, not only the whole of space and time, but across eternity, PESKIE. The theory also proves that I can never be wrong with my predictions, because somewhere, in one of these dimensions, I get my prediction right.
Actually Quantum mechanics and the theory of Hiagdinger's Twat perfectly describes the concept of multi-verse. But that has clearly escaped you. String theory is one way of conceptualising multiverse, but it is not the only theory. Take this as a compliment though HIAG, as I am helping you to investigate further and expand your understanding beyond your obsession with ****ing in a closet. Maybe in a parallel dimension, you are an openly gay Lawyer, you get your predictions right, your comments don't come back to haunt you, Spurs have overtaken Arsenal and you don't make a tit out of yourself for your own pleasure. However the salient point is that the dimension in which we inhabit in the here and now demonstrates that the **** you believe only takes place in your head.
It sums you up HIAG that you have to rely on a parallel dimension to be right. In this one you are full of ****
You can ban people from the Arsenal board for showing you up but you can't change the facts. Chelsea>Arsenal in revenue third season in a row http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-25844751 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deloitte_Football_Money_League#2012.E2.80.9313
Check this year's figures from Companies House, they are the most accurate figures as that's what the clubs return to HMRC http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/may/01/premier-league-accounts-club-by-club-david-con If you still need convincing check with HIAG, he's a Lawyer You might have to track him down in another dimension though
We are ahead of you according to this year's (13/14) figures according to the Guardian and every single newspaper today http://www.theguardian.com/football...ited-tipped-overtake-real-madrid-money-league
