Home games

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

monty987

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2011
8,770
3,540
113
sunderland
No match till 1st October ridiculous, we could bring the Blackpool (4th Oct) game forward to next week, but need a striker in, they better get one in quick. You knew this would happen when Broadhead went to Wigan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf
No match till 1st October ridiculous, we could bring the Blackpool (4th Oct) game forward to next week, but need a striker in, they better get one in quick. You knew this would happen when Broadhead went to Wigan.
That LND would get injured? We prefer to play 2 up top when all of last season it was 1?
 
  • Like
Reactions: young2077
No match till 1st October ridiculous, we could bring the Blackpool (4th Oct) game forward to next week, but need a striker in, they better get one in quick. You knew this would happen when Broadhead went to Wigan.


I think to do that you would have to consult with Blackpool first.
 
Everyone has 20:20 vision when using hindsight. When Simms signed we thought it was a brilliant backup option to Stewart, then the snake started playing 2 up front almost if to make a point that we were short of strikers.
The club tried to sign Broadhead but he didn't fancy the challenge. So many people seem furious at the club for not signing a striker as good as Stewart who was happy to play 2nd or 3rd fiddle. My challenge back them to is come up with some names of players who fit that criteria because I'm not entirely sure they exist.....
 
Everyone has 20:20 vision when using hindsight. When Simms signed we thought it was a brilliant backup option to Stewart, then the snake started playing 2 up front almost if to make a point that we were short of strikers.
The club tried to sign Broadhead but he didn't fancy the challenge. So many people seem furious at the club for not signing a striker as good as Stewart who was happy to play 2nd or 3rd fiddle. My challenge back them to is come up with some names of players who fit that criteria because I'm not entirely sure they exist.....

They don't exist you are right. A lot seems to think we should be able to pull out a ready made replacement for Stewart that does what he does. I have said a few times you will struggle to find many strikers that does what he does off the ball. Never mind get one to sign as his back up!

As for Monty thinking we can just re-arrange fixtures on a whim!
 
They don't exist you are right. A lot seems to think we should be able to pull out a ready made replacement for Stewart that does what he does. I have said a few times you will struggle to find many strikers that does what he does off the ball. Never mind get one to sign as his back up!

As for Monty thinking we can just re-arrange fixtures on a whim!

Monty's just doing what Monty does best mate.....criticising the club and winding everyone up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: young2077
Sorry, we play Reading next week i forgot, and yes i want Ross to play in these games it is stupid to have to go a month without a home game though, get Borini in if available, but we have to get at least one in we are poor unless. i am not criticising the club i reckon the players brought in a great.