Can you not process words due to the beel? My answer still stands, if HMRC or the press aren't questioning it then I'll go with that over some internet beeler. True story... I know, it just dawned on me that they had achieved very little since the 60's, would that be rangers/Murray/ebt's to blame? Would certainly go to explain the bitterness around here and the desperation to see rangers out of the picture and a few titles passed over. Yeah that's it, question someone elses intelligence in a bid to deflect from the point in hand
i have to agree. He seems to be of the belief that the tax authorities are responsible for stripping titles from the former football club Rangers FC.
Chapper's a pyoor fanny. Always beelin' 'cos his team of duffers is nae more, popping on to not606 to type with his fists and scream at his monitor. Proper spastic.
... or dodging the point Where have I said that? You're a fud Haha, away and lick Harry's arse, you baggy anus'd clown
This was your statement; Quite clearly we are talking about the trophies awarded to the former football club Rangers FC and how those trophies shall be stripped. I then posted the following; You responded Remember, we are talking about footballing sanctions for footballing misdeeds . Yet you either completely ignore the point I was making, or you feel that the tax authorities are responsible for the stripping of titles. So I asked you what relevance you thought this had. You then responded with this; So, we are talking about footballing misdeeds and you have introfuced the tax authorities investigation. So after initially giving you the benefit of the doubt I now recognise you to be a bumbling idiot. Yet I remained polite and further clarified the point I was making in order to illicit a response. This is extremely clear. In response to that you posted the following So despite having me very graciously explaining the point to you, you still go with the answer that the tax authorities are not questioning it…..So obviously you believe that the tax authorities are responsible for removing titles and therefore you are quite clearly monumentally stupid. If you don’t believe that, then perhaps you could do me the courtesy of answering the initial question. If not, we can stick to name calling.
**** me this one is obsessed. What's your problem? What part of "the tax authorities are investigating from 2001-2010 therefor that suggests they only have evidence or suspect they were doing wrong from these dates. At no point did I say or even imply the tax authorities had any say or influence on "title stripping" which by the way, won't happen! Now move on you petty little helmet and be a wee rebel elsewhere.
****ing hell you are thick. Lets take this slowly The tax authorities are investigating up until 2010. Yes or no?
I'll help you out a bit. "Yes Sir RebelBhoy, The tax authorities are investigating up to 2010." Why thank you Chapstick. Ok....so we are talking about the removal of the 2011 title.....when did the 2010/11 season begin. "August 2010" and what year is that in? "2010" So players could have dual/second contracts in 2010/11 season? "I didn't think of that because I am an idiot" I know son.....that is ok. Anyway. Lets assume that Rangers used EBT's incorrectly up until may 2010 and didn't use them after that. I think it is reasonable to suggest that the players who signed for Rangers and used EBT's during the period up to may 2010 would not have been there had they not been in receipt of these dual payments up to this point. Don't you agree? Now over to you.
You are right. I did mistake you for someone who gave a ****. Perhaps if Rangers had some fans that did give a **** and not ignorant buffoons like you they wouldn't be dead now. And BTW, Those titles awarded to you while you were cheating will of course be taken away.
Ahh you've changed your tune but the amount of times you use phrases like "reasonable to assume" etc indicates that your whole argument is hollow. Yeah your right, it's my fault, I should have urged Craig Whyte to pay the taxes etc. didn't even think if that, ****! How am I going to sleep tonight... ps. you can claim rangers are dead etc all you want but answer this, where will all the trophies from the 1920's be living? That's rights, the trophy room in Ibrox.
How exactly have I changed my tune? I used reasonable to assume because it is reasonable to assume. Don't you agree? Correct, the trophies won in the 1920's will stay at Ibrox. The trophies awarded in this millennium shall not
I don't think they should be stripped no. If they are found guilty of tax dodging, that punishment doesn't fit the crime. Had they been match fixing like marseille or whatever juventus were upto then yes, that's as bad as you can go. And I don't care what anyone of you say, if it were the other way round you would not accept that.
