He's back...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Like i said you THINK you know the answers and again you THINK you know the answers but i repeat you don't. Im happy to accept it was Sucky and as much has i will say.

You came in on the first night when you threatened to ban it so someone pm'd you and explained the crack with it, you then was given the password too correct?

You then banned it anyway cos someone went wumming on the Chelsea board and Bod took offence. We got it back a few days later with the provision that we stuck to the PL board, correct?

What I'm saying is it was after all that that we changed the password... so someone must have updated you with the new password and you must have had a laugh at what the new password was.
 
This is the problem, too many people like TLL thinking they have all the answers. But just based on his comments to me his comments are wrong. Exactly why i keep an open mind against requests to ban.

I actually do. I know everything. Ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
You came in on the first night when you threatened to ban it so someone pm'd you and explained the crack with it, you then was given the password too correct?

You then banned it anyway cos someone went wumming on the Chelsea board and Bod took offence. We got it back a few days later with the provision that we stuck to the PL board, correct?

What I'm saying is it was after all that that we changed the password... so someone must have updated you with the new password and you must have had a laugh at what the new password was.

I repeat for the third time you are wrong.
 
I was asked today if Spurcock was in on your little gang rant, i can see now why i was asked that question <applause>

And here is the problem, little clicky boys and because i refuse toi follow their demands to ban people people such as Sucky and Piskie they get upset. Well they got their way on Sucky.

But yeah i'll grass up grasses, i have no problem with that...you, HiaG and Sky all in a little huddle, drinking buddies.

Fook off i don't come here for mates like you lonely fookers.

I haven't asked you to ban Piskie..whoever uploaded the pics deserves a ban more than someone who called you Barbie you lightweight prick.
 
The whole thread? I've been part of most of it. You've just written words there but nothing to suggest what anybody has done.

I'm currently believing that Sky has flounced because somebody called him a snitch.

There's more to it than that.

Ok
 
The first two are correct.

So how else would you have had access to it after we changed the password unless someone passed it on to you?

Unless you've got access to PM's and all accounts if you desire?


Like I say, you must have laughed when you saw what the new password was, seeing as it had your name in it ;)
 
So how else would you have had access to it after we changed the password unless someone passed it on to you?

Unless you've got access to PM's and all accounts if you desire?


Like I say, you must have laughed when you saw what the new password was, seeing as it had your name in it ;)

I never saw the password and don't have access to PM's - regardless of why you are wrong, it's constant assumptions that people like yourself make, and against what i actually know, that makes me think twice before pulling the trigger.

I asked you for evidence it was Sucky, you couldn't provide it and then you told me only 6 people had access to the account, again that was wrong. Then i think if you can't get the finer detail right, how do i know the password was not given to other third parties. I had no ip data to go on. No one linked me to alleged comments made suggesting Sucky, i was just told to go and find them!

You only have your little world to deal with, i have to deal with multiple discussions and notifications and complaints, then make a balanced judgement but not a bias one that suits your drinking buddy. It was not even his argument it was HiaGs and this is what makes it all the more curious and clouded.
 
Comm will be along soon to discuss how i got 25 pages in a day.

****s, just took me 25 minutes to catch up

So Sky asked for a ban, request accepted. Sucky banned because someone asked for him to be. Village bike was a multiple account that none off you ****ers offered me to join. Jasper asking brb to be nice, and Stan has a poorly leg.

Is that about it?