How do we know the sock owner hasn't been banned already?
You may be waiting for a familiar name to disappear, that might not happen.
You may be waiting for a familiar name to disappear, that might not happen.
... because I actually read posts ...![]()
... because I actually read posts ...![]()
But you always said the bike was multiple posters right?
So who were they then?
brb says there were six but which one of them rode the bike last night is a mystery.But you always said the bike was multiple posters right?
So who were they then?
But you always said the bike was multiple posters right?
So who were they then?
brb says there were six but which one of them rode the bike last night is a mystery.
brb says there were six but which one of them rode the bike last night is a mystery.
...that I don't know ... although I certainly wasn't one ...but you wouldn't need to know who they ALL were to identify the 'guilty poster ...
What if it was none...?
I'm up for that mate but I know you're a technophobe and rely on others to sort your internet **** out for you so I'm not entirely convinced you or your people are up to it given our previous conversations via pm.
What if it was none...?
I think it probably had to be someone.Pointed out that Skiddy's claims of how he tracked down HIAG don't make any sense.
He says that he did it by using details about gigs posted on here. That was Sky and he was making them up. They didn't exist.
(allegedly, inspector brb has confirmed this)I am pretty good at that Quentin ... but no ... so you didn't demand to go above brb's head when he wouldn't ban anyone during "Vegasgate" ? ... must be my memory![]()
But you're certain you know who posted the thread?
true... except skys making up of the truth was actually true...(allegedly, inspector brb has confirmed this)
...absolutely certain? No ...because it was posted as Village Bike ... so nobody but the poster could be certain ...
You got access to my Facebook page by illegally getting your hands on my email address, which has my personal name in it. What you did wasn't at all clever, as my friend has explained to me. A 6 year old, armed with the same information, could have done the same thing. The naughty part was you getting your hands on data that is protected by law.
I know you find that funny, Skiddy, that is why so many people on this site think you are a cretin.
I was lax with my security on my Facebook page. I readily admit that. I didn't realise that the default position with Facebook is to have it open to the general public, and that it's down to us users to close it off. I know that now. I hope that my failings will alert others, so that they can be protected from the kind of cyber attack that you and others made me a victim of.
As you imply, I am not up on these things. I am better informed, now. Of course, I never expected that someone from this site would be so consumed with jealousy and hatred that he would go to the lengths that you have gone in order to embarrass me.
The thing is this, Skids. I know people whose business it is to know other people's business. I'm not talking about hacking into Facebook accounts, I'm talking about much more serious stuff, Skids. I've used this person, in the past, to trace people for me, in my professional capacity. I can assure you they are very much "up to it." You wouldn't believe the kind of information these people can get their hands on. It's frightening, especially if you have anything to hide, mate.
