He's back...
- Thread starter brb
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I know this comment is slightly taking the piss a bit but I feel like I should clarify something.
I'm certainly not 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this situation. Anyone who's a regular here will know I've always liked to play both sides regarding hiag. So sometimes I'd encourage him and/or back him up for comedy factor and others I'd rip him to pieces with his lies - see Walcott n Chambo for example.
But anyone who knows me pretty well - and @Skylarker and @Archers Road are best placed to say this - will know that I'll always be straight with people and speak my mind when it comes to serious stuff, no matter how unpopular it might be.
I'm certainly not jumping on a bandwagon by saying I think what happened earlier was bang out of order. This ain't GC and we've always had certain standards and lines that we won't cross. That line was crossed tonight so I'll happily say it how I see it... And anyone who thinks it was acceptable (no matter how well I get on with them) will have gone down in my estimations a bit.
It speaks volumes to me that Tel who's relatively new here and has always taken the piss out of hiag said straight away that it wasn't right/too far.
Like I say Stan, I know you're probably stirring a bit and that post was slightly tongue in cheek but I just felt I had to clarify that I definitely ain't 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this
I know this comment is slightly taking the piss a bit but I feel like I should clarify something.
I'm certainly not 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this situation. Anyone who's a regular here will know I've always liked to play both sides regarding hiag. So sometimes I'd encourage him and/or back him up for comedy factor and others I'd rip him to pieces with his lies - see Walcott n Chambo for example.
But anyone who knows me pretty well - and @Skylarker and @Archers Road are best placed to say this - will know that I'll always be straight with people and speak my mind when it comes to serious stuff, no matter how unpopular it might be.
I'm certainly not jumping on a bandwagon by saying I think what happened earlier was bang out of order. This ain't GC and we've always had certain standards and lines that we won't cross. That line was crossed tonight so I'll happily say it how I see it... And anyone who thinks it was acceptable (no matter how well I get on with them) will have gone down in my estimations a bit.
It speaks volumes to me that Tel who's relatively new here and has always taken the piss out of hiag said straight away that it wasn't right/too far.
Like I say Stan, I know you're probably stirring a bit and that post was slightly tongue in cheek but I just felt I had to clarify that I definitely ain't 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this
Who got banned Lieb?
I know this comment is slightly taking the piss a bit but I feel like I should clarify something.
I'm certainly not 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this situation. Anyone who's a regular here will know I've always liked to play both sides regarding hiag. So sometimes I'd encourage him and/or back him up for comedy factor and others I'd rip him to pieces with his lies - see Walcott n Chambo for example.
But anyone who knows me pretty well - and @Skylarker and @Archers Road are best placed to say this - will know that I'll always be straight with people and speak my mind when it comes to serious stuff, no matter how unpopular it might be.
I'm certainly not jumping on a bandwagon by saying I think what happened earlier was bang out of order. This ain't GC and we've always had certain standards and lines that we won't cross. That line was crossed tonight so I'll happily say it how I see it... And anyone who thinks it was acceptable (no matter how well I get on with them) will have gone down in my estimations a bit.
It speaks volumes to me that Tel who's relatively new here and has always taken the piss out of hiag said straight away that it wasn't right/too far.
Like I say Stan, I know you're probably stirring a bit and that post was slightly tongue in cheek but I just felt I had to clarify that I definitely ain't 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this
I’m not sure but could you say bandwagon a bit more. Not sure you said bandwagon enough. There needs to be more bandwagons mentioned in drunk jumping on the bandwagon heartfelt bandwagon jump ons.
Not that I’m jumping on the bandwagon as I’m too cool to jump on anyone’s bandwagon.
@Commachio 56 pages
Congratulations on a job well done mate. That's some going for a ****e thread
I'm a little bit jealous, i need to up my game (by quite a bit it seems)
Congratulations on a job well done mate. That's some going for a ****e thread
I'm a little bit jealous, i need to up my game (by quite a bit it seems)
Just bring a pissed Skylarker into the convo, worked a treat for me
... he also palmed me some small mints when nobody was looking ... underhanded tictacs
... he also palmed me some small mints when nobody was looking ... underhanded tictacs
Why Fosse, why?
Why do you do this to yourself
oh yeah and the other thing to keep it going, just keep calling HiaG a Saints fan....three year season ticket he had comm
Yeah I noticed after I posted that I over did that a bit but couldn't be arsed to go back and edit
Just read the last 10 pages... Metths roasting Les
Did Lurch find the lyrics Money for nothing and blue rinse pussy for free too challenging?
I know this comment is slightly taking the piss a bit but I feel like I should clarify something.
I'm certainly not 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this situation. Anyone who's a regular here will know I've always liked to play both sides regarding hiag. So sometimes I'd encourage him and/or back him up for comedy factor and others I'd rip him to pieces with his lies - see Walcott n Chambo for example.
But anyone who knows me pretty well - and @Skylarker and @Archers Road are best placed to say this - will know that I'll always be straight with people and speak my mind when it comes to serious stuff, no matter how unpopular it might be.
I'm certainly not jumping on a bandwagon by saying I think what happened earlier was bang out of order. This ain't GC and we've always had certain standards and lines that we won't cross. That line was crossed tonight so I'll happily say it how I see it... And anyone who thinks it was acceptable (no matter how well I get on with them) will have gone down in my estimations a bit.
It speaks volumes to me that Tel who's relatively new here and has always taken the piss out of hiag said straight away that it wasn't right/too far.
Like I say Stan, I know you're probably stirring a bit and that post was slightly tongue in cheek but I just felt I had to clarify that I definitely ain't 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this
You can rely on everything this man^^^ says (except when he is lagered up, doing bugle, or otherwise chatting bubbles).
He was also a season ticket holder at Southampton for three years, while claiming to be a Spud do keep up
If I'm remembering right, he went to all our PL games, while we were in League 1
I was completely taking the piss.I know this comment is slightly taking the piss a bit but I feel like I should clarify something.
I'm certainly not 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this situation. Anyone who's a regular here will know I've always liked to play both sides regarding hiag. So sometimes I'd encourage him and/or back him up for comedy factor and others I'd rip him to pieces with his lies - see Walcott n Chambo for example.
But anyone who knows me pretty well - and @Skylarker and @Archers Road are best placed to say this - will know that I'll always be straight with people and speak my mind when it comes to serious stuff, no matter how unpopular it might be.
I'm certainly not jumping on a bandwagon by saying I think what happened earlier was bang out of order. This ain't GC and we've always had certain standards and lines that we won't cross. That line was crossed tonight so I'll happily say it how I see it... And anyone who thinks it was acceptable (no matter how well I get on with them) will have gone down in my estimations a bit.
It speaks volumes to me that Tel who's relatively new here and has always taken the piss out of hiag said straight away that it wasn't right/too far.
Like I say Stan, I know you're probably stirring a bit and that post was slightly tongue in cheek but I just felt I had to clarify that I definitely ain't 'jumping on the bandwagon' regarding this