Because of the fact that this group attended a meeting to discuss an, at the time, confidential matter it is, by it's very nature, an inclusive group. Name the people who attended the meeting, signed the NDA & discussed the Scheme with the Strawberry reps who have been omitted from the subsequent email discussion. Everyone who attended the meeting was listed in the minutes so their names are already public. Anybody who was not at the meeting did not need to be, & could not be, included in the subsequent email discussions. The NDA made it inclusive.
It's correct. Why are those, you believe, to have been excluded whinging to you & not contacting OLM or the others themselves? Same old Dutch having sly digs at those involved whilst offering nothing. Name the names of those who are being excluded from confidential email discussions.
Is it ****. It should have been a quick question and reply that for some reason seems to have disturbed a couple of people. It's as though some prefer exclusivity to a broader involvement and want to make mountains out of molehills. Fortunately, the chair of the trust clearly disagrees.
The replies certainly are. They're an exercise is making a simple point an issue and dragging it on and on....
The Chair of the Trust agrees that an email discussion between people who attended a meeting to discuss the new membership ship scheme after signing an NDA should have been an open house discussion. Really? Who are the people who have been excluded from the confidential email discussion? There's only you & your continuous inane, baseless mischief making that's making mountains of mole hills which is making you appear quite disturbed.
Bollocks. Some FWG members didn't hear about meetings and discussions. Now they have an opportunity to. It's what the Trust chairman spoke of on his interview.
Still wrong. Hey ho. It's sorted anyway, or at least soon will be if those in question can be arsed after this nonsense.
The ironic thing about this pointless bollocks, is I don't expect there's going to be any more emails to this group anyway.
You see people on a group. wanting to talk to others in the same group about how to improve things as whinging? It takes all sorts I suppose.
Inclusive consultation in action. It'll be a shame if this is the death of the FWG. But I perhaps events have made it so
That will be PLT then. He had been to the previous meetings but didn't get an invite to the membership scheme meeting because the club think he's a ****. Are there any others that you know of? I think he's ok by the way
No I see you whinging about supposed other people wanting to be involved in confidential discussions as whinging. Everybody who attended the Membership meeting was named & all can be easily contacted if people would like to discuss anything with them. They don't need you to do this for them. You're whinging & creating problems that aren't there, but that's what you do, time & time again.
