Hazard

[Drogs]

The comparison is flawed because you are using grown man hurling abuse at player and getting a kick as a way justifying another grown man kicking a school boy in the ribs because he won't give him a ball.

In black and white, that is why it is flawed.

It also looked absolutely deliberate to me.

No I'm not though I'm using it as an example of fans applauding one act of scummery and gawping at something small. The two situations ARE entirely different, but you still cannot condone one and not the other.

also there is 5 years difference between both people involved. he's 17, therefore not a schoolboy.

 

[PINKIE]

****ing hilarious incident

At the end of the day though, Hazard is a professional and he just can't afford to react. If it had been another player he'd kicked for not giving the ball back, he would have been sent off too. But kicking a ball boy though -what a ****ing twat.

Ball Boy is a idiot too.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

If we're going to be pedantic then chances are that he goes to school thus is a schoolboy, though it's not really the point.

 

[ashbyhoops]

the only reason Hazard shouldn't have done it is because of the totally OTT reaction he's getting from tree hugging football fans . He meant to kick the ball away from his grasp and the the kid has feighned injury (in my opinion) to make Hazard look bad.[/QUOTE

to make him look bad? He done that Himself the day be pulled a scum short

 

[McLarenBluebird]

pushed to the ground then booted in the ribs.. of course its perfectly acceptable /sarcasm

Hazard should be banned, and not short term. Long term. Unacceptable to kick a ball boy. Disgrace to the game, to his club, to his fans, to himself, everything. IN that one moment he showed all that is wrong with football

 

[Drogs]

Obviously I'm one of the tree hugging anti chelsea pc brigade so instead of making a point I'll ask a question...

you have a teenage son ... he is in the park while a group of grown men are playing football. the ball comes his way and he pratts around showing off. He lays on their ball. He does attack or threaten the adults he just lays on the ball. The adult man attempts to kick the ball even though its obvious that he'll probably kick your son. Then after kicking the your son he steps over him picks up the ball and walks off to continue his game leaving your son on the floor.

the park is different to a game of actual importance. Like I said, people are making too big a meal of this, the age gap isn't that significant for a start.

 

[Swarbs]

explain how it's flawed? both 'victims' did something to provoke the other according to you so how do people condone one but not the other?

Cos the provocations weren't the same.

One bloke screams racist abuse at someone.
One bloke refuses to give a ball back.

One of them a great deal more offensive and more likely to provoke a response than the other.

 

[PINKIE]

the only reason Hazard shouldn't have done it is because of the totally OTT reaction he's getting from tree hugging football fans . He meant to kick the ball away from his grasp and the the kid has feighned injury (in my opinion) to make Hazard look bad.

Drogs you ****ing wet blanket, WTF is a tree hugging football fan ?

 

[WhatDoesWoyWant?]

Doesn't matter what the lad did, he's a kid and you can't do that to a kid. Hazard has had a shocker there!

 

[Gazautd]

Cos the provocations weren't the same.

One bloke screams racist abuse at someone.
One bloke refuses to give a ball back.

One of them a great deal more offensive and more likely to provoke a response than the other.

Thank you

 

[DragonPhilljack]

Well this was a turnout for the books! Well done on kicking one of our directors sons!! The boy is a spoilt brat, and we are all laughing our socks off at this, I feel sorry for hazard, but Charlie Morgan, is the son of Martin Morgan, who is one of the directors of Swansea City football club! Next time kick the brat harder.........

 

[PINKIE]

Doesn't matter what the lad did, he's a kid and you can't do that to a kid. Hazard has had a shocker there!

A professional football player simply cannot act in that manner to anybody, on the pitch or off it. The ball boy was being a twat, but he should have left the ref to deal with it. He is going to get the ****ing book thrown at him for this

 

[tjblonks]

or do you tell your son he was an idiot for pratting around

Just this.

 

[King Shergar]

Disgraceful behaviour kicking a young lad. It seems Chelsea have signed yet another classless turd, to join the likes of Terry and Cole

 

[tjblonks]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[remembercolinlee]

the park is different to a game of actual importance. Like I said, people are making too big a meal of this, the age gap isn't that significant for a start.

so it is not ok in a park game but is in a professional game

Seriously...just admit Hazard was a stupid prick who should have known better...you are simply making yourself look silly now

 

[angelordevil]

Obviously I'm one of the tree hugging anti chelsea pc brigade so instead of making a point I'll ask a question...

you have a teenage son ... he is in the park while a group of grown men are playing football. the ball comes his way and he pratts around showing off. He lays on their ball. He does attack or threaten the adults he just lays on the ball. The adult man attempts to kick the ball even though its obvious that he'll probably kick your son. Then after kicking the your son he steps over him picks up the ball and walks off to continue his game leaving your son on the floor.

At 17 my son had enough sense not to do anything like that in the first place in case he got his head kicked in. I taught him well, and he knows that all actions have consequences. Plus if he had of been that stupid I would have told him it was his own fault.

 

[WhatDoesWoyWant?]

Drogs, the example given was a good one and given your reaction I guess you have no kids? If a man kicked your child in those circumstances how would you feel? It makes no difference if its in the park or a 'proper' game.

 

[Chief]

The comparison is flawed because you are using grown man hurling abuse at player and getting a kick as a way justifying another grown man kicking a school boy in the ribs because he won't give him a ball.

In black and white, that is why it is flawed.

It also looked absolutely deliberate to me.

No I'm not though I'm using it as an example of fans applauding one act of scummery and gawping at something small. The two situations ARE entirely different, but you still cannot condone one and not the other.

also there is 5 years difference between both people involved. he's 17, therefore not a schoolboy.

He didn't know that though.

As the **** Cantona kicked was a known thug and bnp member then that is also ok after the fact then.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not outraged by what he did but he definitely deserved to be sent off. You just don't go kicking ball boys for the sake of five seconds, even if they are seventeen.

 

[Drogs]

Cos the provocations weren't the same.

One bloke screams racist abuse at someone.
One bloke refuses to give a ball back.

One of them a great deal more offensive and more likely to provoke a response than the other.

jesus christ, are you lot really this thick? I'm not comparing the SITUATIONS, I'm comparing the stupid reactions to both, if you condone a professional kicking a fan in the face you cannot slate a professional for accidently kicking a ball boy in the ribs

Drogs you ****ing wet blanket, WTF is a tree hugging football fan ?

another word for PC brigade!