Ballboy got what he deserved, shouldn't have wasted time. Not like he's a kid either he's 17. Well done Hazard
Not from me mate!
Drogs:4150483 said:Yeah, it's just the same Drogs.
Cantona kicks a scrote who's abusing him.
Hazard kicks a schoolboy because he won't give him his ball back.
Just the same.
yep, that makes it perfectly acceptable to boot him in the head studs first. He tried to get the ball back, he did not kick him in the sense people are going on about.
Jesus christ.
yep, that makes it perfectly acceptable to boot him in the head studs first. He tried to get the ball back, he did not kick him in the sense people are going on about.
Jesus christ.
Shocking? I bet you lick cantona's rim for bird kicking a fan. **** all wrong with what he did, ball boy was cheating.
he's in trouble then...If you think it's the same you are a ****ing idiot.
last time I'll say it - he tried to kick the ball, not the lad.


yep, that makes it perfectly acceptable to boot him in the head studs first. He tried to get the ball back, he did not kick him in the sense people are going on about.
Jesus christ.
People are talking about it in the sense that they see Hazard kick a kid sharply in the ribs then walk around with a smirk on his face because he thinks he got away with it until the referee called him over. Nowhere near the ball.Drogs:4150544 said:If you think it's the same you are a ****ing idiot.
I used it to make a point ruff, if you condone a kick to the head you can't draw breath at minute ****e like this.
You would have done **** all you ****ing wimpNo? You should hear what I'd have done to the little scamp![]()

But he DID kick him didn't he?
An adult kicked a child who was laying on a ball...WTF did he think would happen? How ****ing stupid must he be to then pick the ball up and hope to carry on with the match? And then to look surprised at getting a red card?
and your first comment was ... "**** all wrong with what he did, ball boy was cheating."
... then you blame tree huggers for over reacting![]()
